Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BURCHARD, E. M. L.
Right arrow Articles by KOTKOV, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BURCHARD, E. M. L.
Right arrow Articles by KOTKOV, B.

Psychosomatic Medicine 10:257-274 (1948)
© 1948 American Psychosomatic Society

Criteria for the Evaluation of Group Therapy

EDWARD M. L. BURCHARD Ph.D.1, JOSEPH J. MICHAELS M.D.2, and BENJAMIN KOTKOV Ph.D.3

1 Assistant professor clinical psychology, Queens College, New York, formerly chief clinical psychologist, Boston Mental Hygiene Unit
2 Psychiatric consultant, Boston Mental Hygiene Unit
3 Chief clinical psychologist, Boston Mental Hygiene Unit

A review of the literature on group psychotherapy revealed wide divergences in orientation, goals, technics and methods of reporting.

The omission of pertinent variables from many reports and the lack of any generally accepted vocabulary and frame of reference made any comparison of methods or evaluation of differential success almost unsurmountable.

In an attempt to clarify this situation the authors have developed a proposed schema of pertinent variables embracing seven major categories with varying numbers of subdivisions. The suggested major categories are: (a) therapist's frame of reference, (b) therapeutic aims and goals; (c) patient population treated; (d) role of therapist; (e) the group; (f) management of meetings; and (g) appraisal of results.

The reports of fifteen investigators representing different therapeutic approaches were analyzed according to the proposed schema and the results of this analysis presented in summarized form on charts. Examination of the charts reveal the lack of uniformity in the reporting of significant data.

If the foregoing suggestions are utilized, it may be possible that a measure of uniformity in the reporting of studies in group psychotherapy will be introduced. The inclusion of such a basic number of minimum variables may make it possible to compare technics and assay results.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
R. R. Dies
Group Psychotherapy: Reflections on Three Decades of Research
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, July 1, 1979; 15(3): 361 - 373.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
I. D. Yalom, P. S. Houts, S. M. Zimerberg, and K. H. Rand
Prediction of Improvement in Group Therapy: An Exploratory Study
Arch Gen Psychiatry, August 1, 1967; 17(2): 159 - 168.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
J. C. WESTMAN
An Overview of Group Psychotherapy
Arch Gen Psychiatry, March 1, 1960; 2(3): 271 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1948 by the American Psychosomatic Society