Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by AX, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by AX, A. F.

Psychosomatic Medicine 15:433-442 (1953)
© 1953 American Psychosomatic Society

The Physiological Differentiation between Fear and Anger in Humans

ALBERT F. AX Ph.D.1

1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 5, Washington

Forty-three subjects were stimulated in the laboratory to "fear" and "anger," during which the following physiological reactions were recorded: (1) heart rate, (2) ballistocardiogram, (3) respiration rate, (4) face temperature, (5) hand temperature, (6) skin conductance, and (7) integrated muscle potential. The scores used were the maximum rise and maximum fall from the preceding resting level and the number of responses of a critical value per unit time. Of the 14 scores thus obtained, 7 showed significant discrimination between anger and fear. Diastolic blood pressure rises, heart rate falls, number of rises in skin conductance, and muscle potential increases, were greater for anger than for fear, whereas skin conductance increases, number of muscle potential increases, and respiration rate increases were greater for fear than for anger. Profile difference scores, computed from appropriate combinations of these differences, were found to be greater than zero in 42 of the 43 cases and to have a mean which deviated very significantly from zero, which rejects the null hypothesis that there is no difference in physiological reaction between anger and fear.

The patterns obtained for anger and fear argue against the Arnold proposal that anger is a strong reaction of both the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous systems, whereas fear is but a sympathetic reaction.

Another finding was the very low correlations among the physiological reactions and the significantly higher intercorrelations for anger than for fear, which was interpreted as indicating greater physiological integration during anger.

Between-subject variance was significantly greater than within-subject variance, which supports the findings of Lacey and Malmo that there is considerable specificity in physiological response patterns.

The physiological response patterns of anger were suggested as being similar to those produced by injections of epinephrine and nor-epinephrine combined, and those of fear as being similar to injections of epinephrine.

Submitted on July 29, 1952




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
S. Telles, K. V. Naveen, and M. Dash
Yoga Reduces Symptoms of Distress in Tsunami Survivors in the Andaman Islands
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., December 1, 2007; 4(4): 503 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
R. A. Wright and L. D. Kirby
Cardiovascular Correlates of Challenge and Threat Appraisals: A Critical Examination of the Biopsychosocial Analysis
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2003; 7(3): 216 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Chem SensesHome page
B. Danuser
Candidate Physiological Measures of Annoyance from Airborne Chemicals
Chem Senses, April 1, 2001; 26(3): 333 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
J. P. DILLARD, C. A. PLOTNICK, L. C. GODBOLD, V. S. FREIMUTH, and T. EDGAR
The Multiple Affective Outcomes of AIDS PSAs: Fear Appeals Do More Than Scare People
Communication Research, February 1, 1996; 23(1): 44 - 72.
[Abstract]

Home page
 Social Science InformationHome page
H. G. Wallbott and K. R. Scherer
How universal and specific is emotional experience? Evidence from 27 countries on five continents
Social Science Information, December 1, 1986; 25(4): 763 - 795.


Home page
 ScienceHome page
P Ekman, R. Levenson, and W. Friesen
Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions
Science, September 16, 1983; 221(4616): 1208 - 1210.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Science InformationHome page
G. E. Schwartz
Psychophysiological patterning and emotion from a systems perspective
Social Science Information, November 1, 1982; 21(6): 781 - 817.


Home page
 The Counseling PsychologistHome page
D. Mermin
Gestalt Theory of Emotion
The Counseling Psychologist, December 1, 1974; 4(4): 15 - 20.


Home page
 Sociological Methods ResearchHome page
E. F. Borgatta and G. W. Bohrnstedt
Some Limitations On Generalizability From Social Psychological Experiments
Sociological Methods Research, August 1, 1974; 3(1): 111 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Humanistic PsychologyHome page
S. Kiesler
Emotion in Groups1
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, July 1, 1973; 13(3): 19 - 31.
[Abstract]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
R. B. Williams and B. Eichelman
Social Setting: Influence on the Physiological Response to Electric Shock in the Rat
Science, November 5, 1971; 174(4009): 613 - 614.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
J. J. Schildkraut and S. S. Kety
Biogenic Amines and Emotion
Science, April 7, 1967; 156(3771): 21 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1953 by the American Psychosomatic Society