Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STUNKARD, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by STUNKARD, A.

Psychosomatic Medicine 21:281-289 (1959)
© 1959 American Psychosomatic Society

Obesity and the Denial of Hunger

ALBERT STUNKARD M.D.1

1 Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia 4, Pa

The relationship of gastric motility to the experience of hunger has been investigated. In accord with traditional views a group of nonobese women usually reported hunger during contractions of the empty stomach, and no hunger in the absence of such contractions. A group of obese women, on the other hand, usually failed to report hunger during the presence of stomach contractions. This denial of hunger extended to a denial of sensations of epigastric emptiness and of the desire to eat, --fundamental characteristics of the hunger experience among nonobese women. That the denial of hunger was due to a specific difficulty in discrimination in the presence of gastric motility is suggested by the observation that there was no difference between obese and nonobese women in the distribution of hunger reports in the absence of gastric motility.

Obese subjects manifesting the "nighteating syndrome" showed a significantly higher incidence of denials of hunger than did obese persons not manifesting this syndrome.

The suggestion is made that denial of hunger occurs in persons with a conflict over eating who are simultaneously subjected to strong social pressures in this regard. Its function, according to this hypothesis, would be to exclude from awareness any stimuli that signal an approaching caloric deficit with its concomitant conflict over eating.

Submitted on March 16, 1959




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
W. S. Agras, D. H. Barlow, H. N Chapin, G. G. Abel, and H. Leitenberg
Behavior Modification of Anorexia Nervosa
Arch Gen Psychiatry, March 1, 1974; 30(3): 279 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
W. Weintraub and H. Aronson
Application of Verbal Behavior Analysis to the Study of Psychological Defense Mechanisms: V. Speech Pattern Associated With Overeating
Arch Gen Psychiatry, December 1, 1969; 21(6): 739 - 744.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
S. Schachter
Obesity and Eating
Science, August 23, 1968; 161(3843): 751 - 756.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
A. STUNKARD and C. KOCH
The Interpretation of Gastric Motility: I. Apparent Bias in the Reports of Hunger by Obese Persons
Arch Gen Psychiatry, July 1, 1964; 11(1): 74 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
C. B. THOMAS and M. A. KENDRICK
Psychobiological Studies: I. The Relationship of Intellectual Productivity as Measured by the Rorschach Test to Body Weight
Ann Intern Med, March 1, 1962; 56(3): 440 - 447.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1959 by the American Psychosomatic Society