Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAWKINS, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by SANDIFER, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HAWKINS, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by SANDIFER, M. G., Jr.

Psychosomatic Medicine 23:1-17 (1961)
© 1961 American Psychosomatic Society

A Multivariant Psychopharmacologic Study in Normals

DAVID R. HAWKINS M.D.1, ROBERT PACE M.A.1, BERNARD PASTERNACK Ph.D.1, and MYRON G. SANDIFER Jr. M.D.1

1 Departments of Psychiatry, Sociology and Anthropology, and Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N. C.

Using a double-blind technique, chlorpromazine (25 mg.), amobarbital (200 mg.), dextroamphetamine (10 mg.), meprobamate (200 mg.), and a placebo were given intramuscularly during 10 weekly 3-hour experimental sessions to 10 fourth-year medical students. The subjects and an experimenter were observed by a psychiatrist and a social scientist. An MMPI and sociometric ratings were obtained on each subject. At 0, 1, 2, and 3 hours each subject took a subjective questionnaire scored for mood, mentation, and sedation; a serial subtraction test; and estimated the drug received. Analysis of variance including the factors drug, experimental session, and subject were performed for the categories on the subjective questionnaire and for the serial subtraction test results.

Chlorpromazine, of the drugs in these doses, was clearly the most active. It was sedating, dysphoric, and caused mental clouding. Amobarbital was variable in action and often indistinguishable from placebo. In general it was sedating, caused mental clouding, and little change in mood. Meprobamate showed very little activity. Dextroamphetamine was variable being, in general, slightly alerting, and tending to promote mild euphoria.

The principle that quantitative techniques can be applied to the study of subjective effects was borne out. The importance of considering multiple factors in drug action is pointed up. There is evidence that the experimental setting inhibits response. The estimation by the subject of the drug received influences outcome.

Membership in a cohesive group facilitated accuracy of drug percept. Social isolation adversely affected correct perception. Individual variation of response was noted. Certain individuals react atypically to a variety of drugs.

Submitted on March 29, 1960




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
F. C. Shontz
Chapter IX: Somatic-Psychological Interaction in Physical and Mental Health
Review of Educational Research, December 1, 1962; 32(5): 530 - 542.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1961 by the American Psychosomatic Society