Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MOSS, T.
Right arrow Articles by EDWARDS, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MOSS, T.
Right arrow Articles by EDWARDS, A. E.

Psychosomatic Medicine 26:267-273 (1964)
© 1964 American Psychosomatic Society

Conflict vs. Conditioning: Effects upon Peripheral Vascular Activity

THELMA MOSS M.A.1 and ALLAN E. EDWARDS Ph.D.1

1 U. S. Veterans Administration Center, Los Angeles, Calif.

A recent Soviet report claims the classical conditioning of an involuntary response. This study refutes that claim. Replicating the Russian design, subjects were asked to inhale at the command, "Inhale," with concomitant vasoconstriction appearing on the plethysmograph. Then Ss were asked not to inhale at the command--and significant vasoconstriction was again obtained, just as was reported. However, in the present study, the same Ss were also trained to obey the command, "Close your eyes," an act which evokes no vasoconstriction. When Ss were asked not to obey the latter command, significant vasoconstriction was again obtained. This outcome does not follow any conditioning paradigm. Rather it supports the concept of conflict, which proposes that two antagonistic responses demanded of one stimulus elicits an emotional state resulting in vasoconstriction.

Submitted on December 26, 1963







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1964 by the American Psychosomatic Society