Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BUCHSBAUM, M.
Right arrow Articles by SILVERMAN, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BUCHSBAUM, M.
Right arrow Articles by SILVERMAN, J.

Psychosomatic Medicine 30:12-22 (1968)
© 1968 American Psychosomatic Society

Stimulus Intensity Control and the Cortical Evoked Response

MONTE BUCHSBAUM M.D.1 and JULIAN SILVERMAN Ph.D.1

1 Laboratory of Psychology and Adult Psychiatry Branch, Clinical Investigations, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md.

Cortical evoked potentials to light flashes of 4 intensities and performances on a kinesthetic figural after-effects perceptual task (KFA) were obtained from normal and nonparanoid schizophrenic subjects. In previous studies it had been shown that individual differences in perception of stimulus intensity could be inferred from KFA performance. In this study, it was hypothesized that individuals whose KFA scores indicated a tendency to reduce the perceived intensity of strong stimulation would show a comparable response tendency on a cortical evoked response procedure. Significant correlations were found between evoked response latency and amplitude measures and KFA values in both normal and psychiatric groups. Sex differences in evoked response parameters were also found, males showing a steeper intensity-response function than females. Further, sex was found to be an important moderator variable of the relationship between evoked response measures and KFA values. These findings were interpreted in terms of a theoretical construct regarding a stimulus intensity control mechanism in the central nervous system.

Submitted on February 2, 1967




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
J. Daumann, B. Till, T. Fischermann, M. Rezk, and E. Gouzoulis-Mayfrank
Intensity dependence of auditory evoked dipole source activity in polydrug ecstasy users: evidence from an 18 months longitudinal study
J Psychopharmacol, March 1, 2006; 20(2): 236 - 244.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Ambrosini, P. Rossi, V. De Pasqua, F. Pierelli, and J. Schoenen
Lack of habituation causes high intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials in migraine
Brain, September 1, 2003; 126(9): 2009 - 2015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
J. D. Lewine, R. J. Thoma, S. L. Provencal, C. Edgar, G. A. Miller, and J. M. Canive
Abnormal Stimulus-Response Intensity Functions in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Electrophysiological Investigation
Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2002; 159(10): 1689 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. Lukas and J Siegel
Cortical mechanisms that augment or reduce evoked potentials in cats
Science, October 7, 1977; 198(4312): 73 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
V. S. Johnston and G. L. Chesney
Electrophysiological Correlates of Meaning
Science, December 6, 1974; 186(4167): 944 - 946.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. A. Hall, M. Rappaport, H. K. Hopkins, and R. Griffin
Tobacco and Evoked Potential
Science, April 13, 1973; 180(4082): 212 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
H. Begleiter, B. Porjesz, C. Yerre, and B. Kissin
Evoked Potential Correlates of Expected Stimulus Intensity
Science, February 23, 1973; 179(4075): 814 - 816.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Rappaport, J. Silverman, H. K. Hopkins, and K. Hall
Phenothiazine Effects on Auditory Signal Detection in Paranoid and Nonparanoid Schizophrenics
Science, November 12, 1971; 174(4010): 723 - 725.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. Buchsbaum and S. S. Stevens
Neural Events and Psychophysical Law
Science, April 30, 1971; 172(3982): 502 - 502.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Psychosomatic Society