| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Psychosomatic Medicine 30:12-22 (1968)
© 1968 American Psychosomatic Society
1 Laboratory of Psychology and Adult Psychiatry Branch, Clinical Investigations, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md.
Cortical evoked potentials to light flashes of 4 intensities and performances on a kinesthetic figural after-effects perceptual task (KFA) were obtained from normal and nonparanoid schizophrenic subjects. In previous studies it had been shown that individual differences in perception of stimulus intensity could be inferred from KFA performance. In this study, it was hypothesized that individuals whose KFA scores indicated a tendency to reduce the perceived intensity of strong stimulation would show a comparable response tendency on a cortical evoked response procedure. Significant correlations were found between evoked response latency and amplitude measures and KFA values in both normal and psychiatric groups. Sex differences in evoked response parameters were also found, males showing a steeper intensity-response function than females. Further, sex was found to be an important moderator variable of the relationship between evoked response measures and KFA values. These findings were interpreted in terms of a theoretical construct regarding a stimulus intensity control mechanism in the central nervous system.
Submitted on February 2, 1967
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Daumann, B. Till, T. Fischermann, M. Rezk, and E. Gouzoulis-Mayfrank Intensity dependence of auditory evoked dipole source activity in polydrug ecstasy users: evidence from an 18 months longitudinal study J Psychopharmacol, March 1, 2006; 20(2): 236 - 244. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ambrosini, P. Rossi, V. De Pasqua, F. Pierelli, and J. Schoenen Lack of habituation causes high intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials in migraine Brain, September 1, 2003; 126(9): 2009 - 2015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Lewine, R. J. Thoma, S. L. Provencal, C. Edgar, G. A. Miller, and J. M. Canive Abnormal Stimulus-Response Intensity Functions in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Electrophysiological Investigation Am J Psychiatry, October 1, 2002; 159(10): 1689 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lukas and J Siegel Cortical mechanisms that augment or reduce evoked potentials in cats Science, October 7, 1977; 198(4312): 73 - 75. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Johnston and G. L. Chesney Electrophysiological Correlates of Meaning Science, December 6, 1974; 186(4167): 944 - 946. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Hall, M. Rappaport, H. K. Hopkins, and R. Griffin Tobacco and Evoked Potential Science, April 13, 1973; 180(4082): 212 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Begleiter, B. Porjesz, C. Yerre, and B. Kissin Evoked Potential Correlates of Expected Stimulus Intensity Science, February 23, 1973; 179(4075): 814 - 816. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rappaport, J. Silverman, H. K. Hopkins, and K. Hall Phenothiazine Effects on Auditory Signal Detection in Paranoid and Nonparanoid Schizophrenics Science, November 12, 1971; 174(4010): 723 - 725. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Buchsbaum and S. S. Stevens Neural Events and Psychophysical Law Science, April 30, 1971; 172(3982): 502 - 502. [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |