Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luborsky, L.
Right arrow Articles by Levitz, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luborsky, L.
Right arrow Articles by Levitz, L.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 38, Issue 6 426-438, Copyright © 1976 by American Psychosomatic Society

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Estimating one's own systolic blood pressure: effects of feedback training

L Luborsky, JP Brady, M McClintock, RE Kron, E Bortnichak and L Levitz

This study was aimed at discovering the ability of subjects to estimate absolute levels of systolic blood pressure after feedback of daily blood pressure information. Twenty-one subjects were studied who had shown a variation of at least +/- 20 mm Hg in systolic pressure during 8 days of base-line measurements. Subjects' estimates were found to be moderately accurate even before any specific blood pressure information feedback was given (mean error was +/- 12.4 mm Hg). Then during 15 days of information feedback, subjects' accuracy improved, e.g., for 10 subjects who were given correct information feedback the mean error was +/- 7.4 mm Hg, a highly significant improvement. This is a high degree of accuracy-especially in comparison with the mean variation of +/- 5.8 mm Hg from 1 min to the next in their systolic blood pressure. The learning of one's range of blood pressures appeared to be the principal component of the improvement. Range information had been provided by giving the subject his range of fluctuation for the 8-day base-line period, and by daily blood pressure information feedback immediately after each estimate. Two types of estimators were distinguished: Those who were relatively accurate versus those who were inaccurate in estimating at their own extremes of blood pressure. Those who were inaccurate at their own extremes (1) paid less attention to the feedback of information they were provided with as well as to the internal cues from their own blood pressure and (2) were more field independent.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav ModifHome page
A. M. Gross, D. A. Wojnilower, R. B. Levin, J. Dale, P. Crichardson, and P. C. Davidson
Discrimination of Blood Glucose Levels in Insulin-Dependent Diabetics
Behav Modif, July 1, 1983; 7(3): 369 - 382.
[Abstract]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Psychosomatic Society