Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Weitzman, E. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wasserman, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Weitzman, E. D.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 42, Issue 6 575-585, Copyright © 1980 by American Psychosomatic Society

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Theoretical and technical problems in the measurement of nocturnal penile tumescence for the differential diagnosis of impotence

MD Wasserman, CP Pollak, AJ Spielman and ED Weitzman

Theoretical and technical problems in using Nocturnal Penile Tumescence (NPT) measurements for the differential diagnosis of impotence are discussed and possible solutions are offered: 1) The basic assumption that NPT measurements can distinguish psychogenic from organic impotence has never been demonstrated in patients shown to be psychogenically and organically impotent independent of the NPT measurements themselves. Studies attempting to do this are necessary to determine definitively the limits of the clinical applicability of this important diagnostic tool. 2) Evidence is presented showing that though a direct observation of one of the patient's fullest erections is required for an adequate NPT evaluation, this is not always done. The danger of misdiagnosis if this step is omitted is illustrated with a case report. 3) Disagreements in the literature about NPT criteria for diagnosing psychogenic impotence are discussed and criteria are suggested that are based on demonstrating the intactness of the physiological mechanisms required for erection rather than on values recorded in normal subjects.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the American Psychosomatic Society