Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Natelson, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cagin, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Natelson, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cagin, N. A.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 43, Issue 3 191-197, Copyright © 1981 by American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The role of shock predictability during aversive conditioning in producing psychosomatic digitalis toxicity

BH Natelson and NA Cagin

Guinea pigs were subjected to Pavlovian fear conditioning (signaled shock) and then infused with a fast acting digitalis preparation on a day when all experimental stimuli except shock were delivered. A significant shortening in latency to the onset of life-threatening digitalis toxicity was found when comparisons were made to control pigs that had never been shocked. This effect was not found in other guinea pigs infused with ouabain after exposure to sessions of unsignaled shock. These experiments indicate that psychological factors, when divorced form physical factors, may produce lethal digitalis toxicity in an organism that would otherwise by asymptomatic. The data from these experiments suggest that the intense arousal associated with a signal that had previously been paired with shock is sufficient to precipitate cardiac arrhythmias in an animal with a predisposition to cardiac automaticity such as is produced by digitalis. Conversely, the less intense arousal associated with unsignaled shock is inadequate to produce this effect. This interpretation indicates that the state of an animal's health will affect its psychosomatic response to signaled or unsignaled shock.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Psychosomatic Society