Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Pickering, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by James, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Pickering, T. G.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 48, Issue 7 502-508, Copyright © 1986 by American Psychosomatic Society

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The influence of happiness, anger, and anxiety on the blood pressure of borderline hypertensives

GD James, LS Yee, GA Harshfield, SG Blank and TG Pickering

Differences in blood pressure associated with reported happiness, anger, and anxiety are examined among 90 borderline hypertensives during 24-hr blood pressure monitoring. There were 1152 individual ambulatory blood pressure readings for which subjects classified their emotional state as happy (n = 628), angry (n = 67), or anxious (n = 457) on scales from one (low) to ten (high). Pressures were transformed to z-scores using the subject's 24-hr mean and standard deviation to assess relative elevation during reported emotional arousal. The results show that emotional arousal significantly increases systolic and diastolic pressure (p less than 0.00001), an effect independent of posture and location of subject during measurement (at work, home, or elsewhere). On average, pressures during reported angry or anxious states were higher than those during a happy state (p less than 0.01). Examination of arousal intensity showed that scores on the happiness scale were inversely related to systolic pressure (p less than 0.01) whereas the degree of anxiety was positively associated with diastolic pressure (p less than 0.02). Emotional effects were also related to the degree of individual daily pressure variation such that the greater the variability, the larger the blood pressure change associated with the emotions. The results suggest that happiness, anger, and anxiety increase blood pressure to differing degrees and that emotional effects may be greater in individuals with more labile blood pressure.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
N Wager, G Fieldman, and T Hussey
The effect on ambulatory blood pressure of working under favourably and unfavourably perceived supervisors
Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2003; 60(7): 468 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Psychosom. Med.Home page
R. Friedman, J. E. Schwartz, P. L. Schnall, P. A. Landsbergis, C. Pieper, W. Gerin, and T. G. Pickering
Psychological Variables in Hypertension: Relationship to Casual or Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Men
Psychosom Med, January 1, 2001; 63(1): 19 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Psychosom. Med.Home page
R. G. Jacob, J. F. Thayer, S. B. Manuck, M. F. Muldoon, L. K. Tamres, D. M. Williams, Y. Ding, and C. Gatsonis
Ambulatory Blood Pressure Responses and the Circumplex Model of Mood: A 4-Day Study
Psychosom Med, May 1, 1999; 61(3): 319 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. E. Seta and J. J. Seta
Increments and Decrements in Mean Arterial Pressure as a Function of Audience Composition: An Averaging and Summation Analysis
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 1992; 18(2): 173 - 181.
[Abstract]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Psychosomatic Society