Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirsch, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Geer, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirsch, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Geer, J. H.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 50, Issue 2 175-182, Copyright © 1988 by American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Skin conductance and heart rate in women with premenstrual syndrome

JR Kirsch and JH Geer
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Department of Psychology 70803.

This study investigated the effects of the menstrual cycle phase on certain components of autonomic arousal and task performance. Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) women and matched controls (non-PMS) were tested both premenstrually and postmenstrually. The conditions selected were a) the presentation of 10 tones, b) a proofreading performance task, and c) a word-association learning task. Skin conductance and heart rate were continuously monitored. No significant effects were found on baseline physiological measures, or on proofreading or word-association performance. A significant point in cycle effect for skin conductance and HR orienting response to the tones was found showing smaller HR and skin conductance responses postmenstrually. Several significant PMS classifications by point in menstrual cycle interactions were found. These indicated that, paradoxically, the non-PMS subjects showed higher spontaneous skin conductance responding during the word association task and higher skin conductance responses to tones prior to menses. While in contrast, PMS subjects yielded higher responding on the same measures postmenstrually. On stress ratings, PMS subjects reported experiencing more stress postmenstrually. Results are discussed in terms of the possible role of expectancy factors and inaccurate self-monitoring.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
R. Hoehn-Saric, D. R. McLeod, F. Funderburk, and P. Kowalski
Somatic Symptoms and Physiologic Responses in Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Panic Disorder: An Ambulatory Monitor Study
Arch Gen Psychiatry, September 1, 2004; 61(9): 913 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Psychosomatic Society