Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCrae, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCrae, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R. B., Jr

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 51, Issue 1 58-65, Copyright © 1989 by American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

A caution on the use of the MMPI K-correction in research on psychosomatic medicine

RR McCrae, PT Costa Jr, WG Dahlstrom, JC Barefoot, IC Siegler and RB Williams Jr
Gerontology Research Center, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD 21224.

The MMPI K scale is widely used to screen for invalid responses and to adjust substantive scale scores for defensiveness. In a normal volunteer sample, correlations of MMPI clinical scales and the Cook-Medley Hostility (HO) scale with self-reports and peer ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) were decreased rather than increased by K-correction. Similarly, in a medical sample, structured interview-based ratings of Potential for Hostility were better predicted by uncorrected HO scores than by K-corrected HO scores. Finally, in a prospective study of mortality among lawyers, uncorrected HO scores were a significant predictor of all-cause mortality; K-corrected scores were not. The data suggest that, under some circumstances, the K scale may measure substantive traits rather than defensiveness, and should be used and interpreted with caution. Its use is probably contraindicated for most research on psychiatrically normal subjects.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Career AssessmentHome page
M. Darcy and T. J. G. Tracey
Integrating Abilities and Interests in Career Choice: Maximal versus Typical Assessment
Journal of Career Assessment, May 1, 2003; 11(2): 219 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
R. R. McCrae
The Counterpoint of Personality Assessment: Self Reports and Observer Ratings
Assessment, June 1, 1994; 1(2): 159 - 172.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Psychosomatic Society