Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Achmon, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hart, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Achmon, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hart, J.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 51, Issue 2 152-164, Copyright © 1989 by American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Behavioral treatment of essential hypertension: a comparison between cognitive therapy and biofeedback of heart rate

J Achmon, M Granek, M Golomb and J Hart
Outpatient Mental Clinic, Gehah Psychiatric Hospital, Beilinson Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.

The efficacy and the mechanisms of action of two behavioral treatments for essential hypertension were compared: cognitive group therapy for anger control and biofeedback for heart rate control. The cognitive therapy aimed at lowering the "general anger" level and helping overt expression of "anger out;" heart rate biofeedback aimed at slowing heart rate in stress situations. Ninety-seven essential hypertensive patients were randomly assigned to three groups; after 20 dropouts, 77 patients fully participated in the study: cognitive treatment (N = 30), biofeedback (N = 27), and control (no treatment, N = 20). The treatments were held in 17 weekly sessions; during treatment, blood pressure was measured once a month, and during follow-up after 1 and 6 months. The anger level and heart rate control were assessed at the beginning and the end of treatment. The main results were: 1) a significant decrease of blood pressure for both treatments as compared with control, 2) a significant decrease of blood pressure with heart rate biofeedback as compared with cognitive therapy, and 3) a better control in anger achieved with cognitive therapy and a lesser control in heart rate as compared with biofeedback.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Counseling PsychologistHome page
J. L. Deffenbacher, E. R. Oetting, and R. A. DiGiuseppe
Principles of Empirically Supported Interventions Applied to Anger Management
The Counseling Psychologist, March 1, 2002; 30(2): 262 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Black PsychologyHome page
E. H. Johnson and A. Greene
The Relationship between Suppressed Anger and Psychosocial Distress in African American Male Adolescents
Journal of Black Psychology, November 1, 1991; 18(1): 47 - 65.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Psychosomatic Society