Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siegman, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siegman, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Berger, T.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 52, Issue 6 631-643, Copyright © 1990 by American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The angry voice: its effects on the experience of anger and cardiovascular reactivity

AW Siegman, RA Anderson and T Berger
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Catonsville 21228.

The results of two studies show that expressive vocal behavior, specifically, speech rate and loudness, influences the experience of anger and cardiovascular reactivity. In both studies, participants spoke about anger-arousing and neutral events using three different voice styles: fast and loud, slow and soft, and normal (personal rate and loudness level). In describing the anger-arousing events, both male and female participants reported feeling significantly more angry and showed significantly greater blood pressure and heart rate reactivity in the fast-loud compared with the normal speaking condition. They also reported feeling significantly less angry and showed significantly lower blood pressure reactivity in the slow-soft compared with the normal voice condition. For males only, the voice manipulation also had significant effects on the participants' anger self-ratings and cardiovascular responses during the neutral communications, but these effects were clearly weaker and less pervasive than those occurring during the angry communications. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for (1) the role of expressive vocal behavior in emotions, and (2) the modification of coronary-prone behavior.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
C. H. TARDY
Biological Perspectives on Language and Social Interaction
American Behavioral Scientist, January 1, 1993; 36(3): 339 - 358.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Psychosomatic Society