Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cox, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, W.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 53, Issue 4 453-462, Copyright © 1991 by American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Intensive versus standard blood glucose awareness training (BGAT) with insulin-dependent diabetes: mechanisms and ancillary effects

DJ Cox, L Gonder-Frederick, D Julian, P Cryer, JH Lee, FE Richards and W Clarke
University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22901.

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients make critical daily self-care decisions on the basis of what they estimate their blood glucose (BG) levels to be. This study: a) replicated efficacy of Standard Blood Glucose Awareness Training (BGAT), b) evaluated the relative efficacy of an Intensive Blood Glucose Awareness Training (BGAT) to enhance patient accuracy of BG estimation, and c) evaluated the mechanisms and ancillary effects of BGAT. Thirty-nine subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Compared with Control, both Standard and Intensive BGAT improved accuracy (p less than 0.001). Intensive BGAT post-treatment accuracy relative to Standard BGAT did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.177). Greater improvement in accuracy was associated with poorer pretreatment accuracy. Only Intensive BGAT improved metabolic control (glycosylated hemoglobin), and this improvement was associated with poorer pretreatment control. The effects of BGAT were highly specific, affecting only accuracy and metabolic control, and not affecting fear of hypoglycemia, diabetes knowledge, of frequency of blood glucose monitoring.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. D.M. Stork, T. W. van Haeften, and T. F. Veneman
Diabetes and Driving: Desired data, research methods and their pitfalls, current knowledge, and future research
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2006; 29(8): 1942 - 1949.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
M. M. Lane
Advancing the Science of Perceptual Accuracy in Pediatric Asthma and Diabetes
J. Pediatr. Psychol., April 1, 2006; 31(3): 233 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes Spectr.Home page
D. J. Cox, L. Gonder-Frederick, L. Ritterband, K. Patel, H. Schachinger, G. Fehm-Wolfsdorf, N. Hermanns, F. Snoek, J. Zrebiec, W. Polonsky, et al.
Blood Glucose Awareness Training: What Is It, Where Is It, and Where Is It Going?
Diabetes Spectr, January 1, 2006; 19(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
D. J. Cox, L. Gonder-Frederick, W. Polonsky, D. Schlundt, B. Kovatchev, and W. Clarke
Blood Glucose Awareness Training (BGAT-2): Long-term benefits
Diabetes Care, April 1, 2001; 24(4): 637 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
F. E. K. Malerbi and M. A. Matos
Blood Glucose Discrimination Training: The Role of Internal and External Cues
J Health Psychol, March 1, 2001; 6(2): 229 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Psychosomatic Society