Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallant, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gallant, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, J. A.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 54, Issue 2 149-166, Copyright © 1992 by American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Using daily ratings to confirm premenstrual syndrome/late luteal phase dysphoric disorder. Part I. Effects of demand characteristics and expectations

SJ Gallant, DA Popiel, DM Hoffman, PK Chakraborty and JA Hamilton
Department of Medical Psychology, Uniformed Services of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4799.

Daily symptom ratings were evaluated in 31 women who met DSM III-R criteria for a diagnosis of Late Luteal Phase Dysphoric Disorder (LLPDD), and 34 women who reported no premenstrual symptomatology. Women in both groups were randomly assigned to be aware or unaware of the menstrual cycle focus of the study. Results revealed a consistent pattern of cyclic effects, with higher ratings in the mid-luteal, premenstrual and menstrual phases for many symptoms. Ratings of women reporting severe symptoms were not affected by knowing the purpose of the study and were higher than ratings in the asymptomatic group for many symptoms relevant to the LLPDD diagnosis. Awareness of the study focus did increase cyclicity in the ratings of asymptomatic women aware of the study focus compared with those who were unaware, but these differences were small and most were not significant. The implications of these findings for research and clinical diagnosis of PMS/LLPDD are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
F. J. Keefe, M. A. Lumley, A. L. H. Buffington, J. W. Carson, J. L. Studts, C. L. Edwards, D. J. Macklem, A. K. Aspnes, L. Fox, and D. Steffey
Changing Face of Pain: Evolution of Pain Research in Psychosomatic Medicine
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2002; 64(6): 921 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
B. Sternfeld, R. Swindle, A. Chawla, S. Long, and S. Kennedy
Severity of Premenstrual Symptoms in a Health Maintenance Organization Population
Obstet. Gynecol., June 1, 2002; 99(6): 1014 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Psychosomatic Society