Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Turk, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marcus, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Turk, D. C.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 57, Issue 6 527-535, Copyright © 1995 by American Psychosomatic Society

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Nonpharmacological management of headaches during pregnancy

DA Marcus, L Scharff and DC Turk
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

Concerns about the effects of maternal medications on the growing baby limit the use of medication treatment for benign conditions, such as recurring headaches, during pregnancy and lactation. Nonpharmacological therapies hold particular promise for pregnant women due to the limited medication options. No controlled studies, however, have reported on the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments for pregnant women. The first study evaluated the effectiveness of a combined nonpharmacological treatment (CT) consisting of relaxation, skin-warming biofeedback, and physical therapy for pregnant women with chronic headaches. In a second study, the CT protocol was compared with an attention control (AC) that received headache education and skin-cooling biofeedback. The first study resulted in significant symptom improvement in 79% of subjects, with an overall 72.9% reduction in headaches. In the second study, both groups improved with treatment; however the CT group was more likely to experience significant headache relief (72.7%) than the AC group (28.6%, chi 2(1) = 4.97, p < .03). Significant improvement was maintained at a 6-month follow-up for over 50% of patients. It is concluded that the combined nonpharmacological treatment was more effective than an attention control in reducing headaches during pregnancy. This treatment was effective regardless of predisposing variables.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Psychosom. Med.Home page
F. J. Keefe, M. A. Lumley, A. L. H. Buffington, J. W. Carson, J. L. Studts, C. L. Edwards, D. J. Macklem, A. K. Aspnes, L. Fox, and D. Steffey
Changing Face of Pain: Evolution of Pain Research in Psychosomatic Medicine
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2002; 64(6): 921 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
L. Scharff, D. A. Marcus, and B. J. Masek
A Controlled Study of Minimal-Contact Thermal Biofeedback Treatment in Children With Migraine
J. Pediatr. Psychol., March 1, 2002; 27(2): 109 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Psychosomatic Society