Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, K. J.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 58, Issue 2 160-164, Copyright © 1996 by American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Differences in salivation to repeated food cues in obese and nonobese women

LH Epstein, R Paluch and KJ Coleman
Behavioral Medicine Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.

In a series of studies we have shown that salivation, a cephalic phase preingestive response, habituates to repeated presentations of olfactory or gustatory cues in nonobese subjects. Previous research has studied the differences in anticipatory response to food cues in obese vs. nonobese subjects. This study was designed to assess if obese and nonobese females differed in their patterns of salivary response to repeated presentation of palatable food cues. The salivary response to 10 gustatory presentations of lemon yogurt was studied in 10 obese and 10 nonobese nonrestrained women. Results showed significant differences in the pattern of salivary responding, with obese subjects showing a significantly slower decline in salivation than nonobese subjects. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that obese women differ from nonobese women in their pattern of response to repeated food cues. The results are discussed in relationship to models of intake that focus on differences in satiety or differences in the reinforcing value of food between obese and nonobese subjects.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. Carnell and J. Wardle
Appetite and adiposity in children: evidence for a behavioral susceptibility theory of obesity
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2008; 88(1): 22 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. M Snoek, L. Huntjens, L. J van Gemert, C. de Graaf, and H. Weenen
Sensory-specific satiety in obese and normal-weight women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2004; 80(4): 823 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Psychosomatic Society