Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Ottenweller, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Ottenweller, J. E.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 59, Issue 1 51-57, Copyright © 1997 by American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The role of stressor intensity and underlying vasculopathy in altering coronary reactivity in cardiomyopathic hamsters

Q Chang, BH Natelson, CD Goldstein and JE Ottenweller
Neurobehavioral Unit, Veterans Administration Medical Center, East Orange, NJ 07018-1095, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Our previous work showed that stress sensitized the vessels of cardiomyopathic hamsters (CMHs), but only hamsters in the lesion-forming period of their life. We hypothesized that we would find an interaction between stressor intensity and microvascular vulnerability. METHOD: Male CMHs at ages of 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 months were stressed with supine immobilization for five consecutive days. Stressor intensity was manipulated by immobilizing groups of CMHs at room temperature for 0 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, or 2 hours. CMHs were anesthetized and sacrificed 5 days after stress, and their hearts were perfused using a modified Langendorff system. Body weight changes and baseline coronary vascular resistance (CVR) were recorded, and CVR was also measured after coronary artery infusion of arginine vasopressin (AVP). RESULTS: Stress produced no effect on coronary vasculature in 1.5-month-old CMHs. In 2.5-month-old CMHs, only the two highest-intensity stressors enhanced coronary reactivity to AVP. In 3.5-month-old CMHs, higher-intensity stressors produced a marginal AVP-induced increase in CVR; but this marginal increase was significantly lower than the increases seen with the two highest-stressor intensities in the 2.5-month-old CMHs. CONCLUSION: The stress-induced coronary hyperreactivity to AVP seen in 2.5-month-old CMHs diminished when microvascular vulnerability was lower in 3.5-month-old CMHs. For 1.5-month-old CMHs, the resting CVR was extremely high, so that the addition of stress produced no further increase. Thus, stressor intensity interacted with microvascular vulnerability to alter the consequences of stress.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Psychosomatic Society