Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobsen, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Offit, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobsen, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Offit, K.

Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol 59, Issue 5 459-466, Copyright © 1997 by American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Decision-making about genetic testing among women at familial risk for breast cancer

PB Jacobsen, HB Valdimarsdottier, KL Brown and K Offit
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa 33620, USA.

OBJECTIVE: Recent identification of the breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 and the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2 have raised the possibility of clinical genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. This study examined decision-making about future susceptibility testing among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Based on the transtheoretical model, it was hypothesized that readiness to undergo testing would be related to the ratio between the perceived advantages (pros) and disadvantages (cons) of learning one's susceptibility status. METHODS: Seventy-four women with one or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer were recruited before a routine mammogram. Participants completed measures assessing readiness to undergo testing, perceived pros and cons of testing, and perceived breast cancer risk. Family history data was used to calculate empiric genetic risk of developing breast cancer. RESULTS: Forty-six per cent of participants planned to seek genetic testing as soon as possible, 35% planned to seek testing in the future, and 19% did not plan to seek testing. As expected, greater readiness to undergo testing was associated with a positive decisional balance (pros > cons). Older age and greater perceived risk (but not empiric risk) also were associated with greater readiness. CONCLUSION: The readiness of many women to seek breast cancer susceptibility testing can be attributed, in large part, to their perceptions that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Examination of these perceptions suggests that notification of carrier status may have significant effects on women's psychological well-being and breast cancer surveillance and prevention behaviors.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. C. O'Neill, N. T. Brewer, S. E. Lillie, E. F. Morrill, E. C. Dees, L. A. Carey, and B. K. Rimer
Women's Interest in Gene Expression Analysis for Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk
J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2007; 25(29): 4628 - 4634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. E. Ropka, J. Wenzel, E. K. Phillips, M. Siadaty, and J. T. Philbrick
Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2006; 15(5): 840 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
L. d'Agincourt-Canning
Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Responsibility and Choice
Qual Health Res, January 1, 2006; 16(1): 97 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
C. Wang, D. J. Bowen, and S. L. R. Kardia
Research and Practice Opportunities at the Intersection of Health Education, Health Behavior, and Genomics
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 686 - 701.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
S. D. Taylor
Predictive Genetic Test Decisions for Huntington's Disease: Elucidating the Test/No-test Dichotomy
J Health Psychol, July 1, 2005; 10(4): 597 - 612.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. A. Keogh, M. C. Southey, J. Maskiell, M.-A. Young, C. L. Gaff, J. Kirk, K. M. Tucker, D. Rosenthal, M. R.E. McCredie, G. G. Giles, et al.
Uptake of Offer to Receive Genetic Information about BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in an Australian Population-Based Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2258 - 2263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. M. Miller, D. J. Bowen, M. K. Campbell, M. A. Diefenbach, E. R. Gritz, P. B. Jacobsen, M. Stefanek, C. Y. Fang, D. Lazovich, K. A. Sherman, et al.
Current Research Promises and Challenges in Behavioral Oncology: Report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology Annual Meeting, 2002
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2004; 13(2): 171 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
L. S. Porter, M. Mishel, V. Neelon, M. Belyea, E. Pisano, and M. S. Soo
Cortisol Levels and Responses to Mammography Screening in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study
Psychosom Med, September 1, 2003; 65(5): 842 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
H. S. Thompson, H. B. Valdimarsdottir, C. Duteau-Buck, J. Guevarra, D. H. Bovbjerg, C. Richmond-Avellaneda, D. Amarel, D. Godfrey, K. Brown, and K. Offit
Psychosocial Predictors of BRCA Counseling and Testing Decisions among Urban African-American Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2002; 11(12): 1579 - 1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
M Welkenhuysen, G Evers-Kiebooms, M Decruyenaere, E Claes, and L Denayer
A community based study on intentions regarding predictive testing for hereditary breast cancer
J. Med. Genet., August 1, 2001; 38(8): 540 - 547.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ ResHome page
K. Bosompra, T. Ashikaga, B. S. Flynn, J. K. Worden, and L. J. Solomon
Psychosocial factors associated with the public's willingness to pay for genetic testing for cancer risk: a structural equations model
Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2001; 16(2): 157 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. E. Myers, T. Hyslop, K. Jennings-Dozier, T. A. Wolf, D. Y. Burgh, J. A. Diehl, C. Lerman, and G. W. Chodak
Intention to Be Tested for Prostate Cancer Risk among African-American Men
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2000; 9(12): 1323 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
B. MEISER, P. BUTOW, A. BARRATT, G. SUTHERS, M. SMITH, A. COLLEY, E. THOMPSON, and K. TUCKER
Attitudes to genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer
J. Med. Genet., June 1, 2000; 37(6): 472 - 476.
[Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. D. Schwartz, C. Hughes, J. Roth, D. Main, B. N. Peshkin, C. Isaacs, C. Kavanagh, and C. Lerman
Spiritual Faith and Genetic Testing Decisions among High-Risk Breast Cancer Probands
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2000; 9(4): 381 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. Glanz, J. Grove, C. Lerman, C. Gotay, and L. L. Marchand
Correlates of Intentions to Obtain Genetic Counseling and Colorectal Cancer Gene Testing Among At-Risk Relatives from Three Ethnic Groups
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 1999; 8(4): 329 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. W. Vernon, E. R. Gritz, S. K. Peterson, C. A. Perz, S. Marani, C. I. Amos, and W. F. Baile
Intention to Learn Results of Genetic Testing for Hereditary Colon Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 1999; 8(4): 353 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. R. Grann, W. Whang, J. S. Jacobson, D. F. Heitjan, K. H. Antman, and A. I. Neugut
Benefits and Costs of Screening Ashkenazi Jewish Women for BRCA1 and BRCA2
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 1999; 17(2): 494 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
R. T. Croyle and C. Lerman
Risk Communication in Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, January 1, 1999; 1999(25): 59 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Psychosomatic Society