Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glynn, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gerin, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glynn, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gerin, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Social Support
Right arrow Psychophysiology
Right arrow General Sexual Medicine Issues
Psychosomatic Medicine 61:234-242 (1999)
© 1999 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Gender, Social Support, and Cardiovascular Responses to Stress

Laura M. Glynn, MA, Nicholas Christenfeld, PhD and William Gerin, PhD

From the Department of Psychology (L.M.G., N.C.), University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California; and Cardiovascular Center, Cornell University Medical College-The New York Hospital (W.G.), New York, New York.

Address reprint requests to: Nicholas Christenfeld, PhD, Department of Psychology, 9500 Gilman Dr., University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109. E:mail: nicko{at}ucsd.edu

OBJECTIVE: Laboratory research indicates that the presence of a supportive other can reduce physiological responses to a stressor. Whether there are gender differences, either on the part of the provider or the recipient, in this social support effect is explored. Such differences might shed some light on the frequent epidemiological reports of gender differences in social support and health.

METHODS: Male and female subjects gave an impromptu speech and received either standardized supportive or nonsupportive feedback from a male or female confederate. Blood pressure and heart rate were monitored continuously during baseline and speech periods.

RESULTS: Speakers with a supportive female audience showed a systolic increase of 25 mm Hg over baseline. Those with a nonsupportive female audience increased 36 mm Hg. A supportive male audience led to increases of 32 mm Hg, and a nonsupportive male audience 28 mm Hg. There was no significant effect of gender of subject.

CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that social support provided by women reduced cardiovascular changes for both male and female speakers compared with presence of a nonsupportive female audience. Social support from men did not. These findings suggest a possible mechanism that might help explain the epidemiological literature on the relationship between gender, social support, and health. The findings are consistent with the notion that married men are healthier because they marry women. Women do not profit as much from marriage or suffer as much from separation, in terms of health outcomes, because the support they gain or lose is the less effective support of a man. These findings render more plausible the possibility that differences in social support might contribute to health differences, through the dampening of cardiovascular responses to stress.

Key Words: social support, • cardiovascular reactivity, • gender, • blood pressure, • stress.

Abbreviations: BPM = beats per minute.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
A. M. Smith, T. J. Loving, E. E. Crockett, and L. Campbell
What's Closeness Got to Do with It? Men's and Women's Cortisol Responses When Providing and Receiving Support
Psychosom Med, October 1, 2009; 71(8): 843 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
B. R. Burleson
Understanding the outcomes of supportive communication: A dual-process approach
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2009; 26(1): 21 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
B. Ditzen, C. Hoppmann, and P. Klumb
Positive Couple Interactions and Daily Cortisol: On the Stress-Protecting Role of Intimacy
Psychosom Med, October 1, 2008; 70(8): 883 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
W. J. Kop, D. S. Berman, H. Gransar, N. D. Wong, R. Miranda-Peats, M. D. White, M. Shin, M. Bruce, D. S. Krantz, and A. Rozanski
Social Network and Coronary Artery Calcification in Asymptomatic Individuals
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2005; 67(3): 343 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
H. L. Fritz, A. J. Nagurney, and V. S. Helgeson
Social Interactions and Cardiovascular Reactivity during Problem Disclosure among Friends
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2003; 29(6): 713 - 725.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
L. M. Glynn, N. Christenfeld, and W. Gerin
The Role of Rumination in Recovery from Reactivity: Cardiovascular Consequences of Emotional States
Psychosom Med, September 1, 2002; 64(5): 714 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. Allen, J. Blascovich, and W. B. Mendes
Cardiovascular Reactivity and the Presence of Pets, Friends, and Spouses: The Truth About Cats and Dogs
Psychosom Med, September 1, 2002; 64(5): 727 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Psychosomatic Society