| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Departments of Psychiatry (D.T.S.L., H.F.K.C.) and Obstetrics and Gynaecology (A.S.K.Y., T.K.H.C.), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Address reprint requests to: Dr. Dominic T. S. Lee, Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Ave., Cambridge, MA 02215. Email: tak_lee{at}hms.harvard.edu
OBJECTIVE: Postnatal depression affects 10% to 15% of women after childbirth. Self-report rating instruments, such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), have been developed and administered to postpartum women to facilitate early detection. Most postnatal depression screening scales, however, focus solely on depressive symptomatology. We hypothesized that applying two complementary rating scales of symptoms and functioning as a double test would significantly enhance the positive predictive value of screening.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted at the postnatal clinic of a university teaching hospital. One hundred forty-five Chinese women completed the EPDS and 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) 6 weeks after delivery. They were then interviewed by a psychiatrist, who used the Structured Clinical Interview for third revised edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, nonpatient version (SCID-NP), to validate the diagnoses.
RESULTS: The positive predictive value of the EPDS and GHQ, when administered independently, was 44% and 52%, respectively, at their respective optimal cutoff scores. When the EPDS-GHQ double test was administered, the positive predictive value was significantly increased to 78%.
CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous administration of the EPDS and GHQ can substantially improve identification of women with postnatal depression. This can potentially reduce unnecessary referrals to general practitioners and psychiatrists and may enhance the overall cost-effectiveness of population-wide screening.
Key Words: postnatal depression screening Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale General HealthQuestionnaire
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DSM-III-R = Diagnosticand Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third revisededition; EPDS = Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; GHQ =General Health Questionnaire; SCID-NP = Structured ClinicalInterview for DSM-III-R, nonpatient version.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. K. Mallikarjun and F. Oyebode Prevention of postnatal depression The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, September 1, 2005; 125(5): 221 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Hood, S. Bennett Johnson, S. K. Carmichael, L. M.B. Laffel, J.-X. She, and D. A. Schatz Depressive Symptoms in Mothers of Infants Identified as Genetically at Risk for Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care, August 1, 2005; 28(8): 1898 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. S. Lee, A. S. K. Yip, S. S. M. Chan, M. H. Y. Tsui, W. S. Wong, and T. K. H. Chung Postdelivery Screening for Postpartum Depression Psychosom Med, May 1, 2003; 65(3): 357 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. KYE Pregnancy in Women With Eating Disorders Am J Psychiatry, July 1, 2002; 159(7): 1249 - 1250. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Other articles noted Evid. Based Ment. Health, November 1, 2000; 3(4): 104 - 104. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |