Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drossman, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Toomey, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drossman, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Toomey, T. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Gastrointestinal
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Psychosomatic Medicine 62:309-317 (2000)
© 2000 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Effects of Coping on Health Outcome Among Women With Gastrointestinal Disorders

Douglas A. Drossman, MD, Jane Leserman, PhD, Zhiming Li, MD, PhD, Francis Keefe, PhD, Yuming J. B. Hu, PhD and Timothy C. Toomey, PhD

From the Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry (D.A.D., J.L., Z.L., Y.J.B.H., T.C.T.), Division of Digestive Diseases, and UNC Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and Department of Psychology (F.K.), Duke University, Durham, NC.

Address reprint requests to: Douglas A. Drossman, MD, Division of Digestive Diseases, 726 Burnett-Womack Bldg., CB 7080, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7080. Email: drossman{at}med.unc.edu

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that the nature and quality of coping may positively or negatively affect health outcome; however, this relationship has not been well studied among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to study the effect of different coping strategies on the health outcome of women with GI disorders and how these coping strategies may modify the effects of education, GI disease type, neuroticism, and abuse severity on health outcome.

METHODS: We followed 174 patients in a referral GI clinic for 12 months to assess their health status as a derived variable of daily pain, bed disability days, psychological distress, daily dysfunction, number of visits to physicians, and number of surgeries and procedures. We obtained at baseline their GI diagnosis (functional vs. organic), neuroticism score (NEO Personality Inventory), sexual and/or physical abuse history, and scores on two coping questionnaires. Regressions analyses were used to determine the relative effect of the coping measures on health outcome and their modifying effects on education, GI disease type, neuroticism, and abuse severity.

RESULTS: A higher score on the Catastrophizing scale and a lower score on the Self-Perceived Ability to Decrease Symptoms scale (Coping Strategies Questionnaire ) predicted poor health outcome. Less education, a functional GI diagnosis, a higher neuroticism score, and greater abuse severity also contributed to poor health status. However, the effect of GI disease type and neuroticism on health outcome was significantly reduced by the coping measures.

CONCLUSIONS: Maladaptive coping (eg, catastrophizing) and decreased self-perceived ability to decrease symptoms may adversely affect health outcome and may modify the effect of GI disease type and neuroticism on health outcome.

Key Words: coping • health status • outcome • gastrointestinal disorders • psychosocial factors

Abbreviations: CSQ = Coping Strategies Questionnaire; GI =gastrointestinal; GSI = General Severity Index; IBD =inflammatory bowel disease; NEO scale = neuroticism extraversionopenness scale; SCL-90-R = Symptoms Checklist 90 Revised; SIP= Sickness Impact Profile; WCQ = Ways of CopingQuestionnaire.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
M. M. Heitkemper and M. E. Jarrett
Update on Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Gender Differences
Nutr Clin Pract, June 1, 2008; 23(3): 275 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
TraumatologyHome page
R. A. Sansone, M. Butler, H. Dakroub, and M. Pole
The Relationship Between Number of Types of Childhood Trauma, Number of Psychophysiological Disorders, and Length of Medical Disability
Traumatology, June 1, 2006; 12(2): 143 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
C. L. Kwan, N. E. Diamant, G. Pope, K. Mikula, D. J. Mikulis, and K. D. Davis
Abnormal forebrain activity in functional bowel disorder patients with chronic pain
Neurology, October 25, 2005; 65(8): 1268 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
F. Creed, E. Guthrie, J. Ratcliffe, L. Fernandes, C. Rigby, B. Tomenson, N. Read, and D. G. Thompson
Reported Sexual Abuse Predicts Impaired Functioning but a Good Response to Psychological Treatments in Patients With Severe Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2005; 67(3): 490 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
K. Kendall-Tackett
Exciting Discoveries on the Health Effects of Family Violence: Where We Are, Where We Need to Go
J Interpers Violence, February 1, 2005; 20(2): 251 - 257.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs Sci QHome page
L. A. Martinez
Self-Care for Stoma Surgery: Mastering Independent Stoma Self-Care Skills in an Elderly Woman
Nurs Sci Q, January 1, 2005; 18(1): 66 - 69.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
J. M. Lackner, B. M. Quigley, and E. B. Blanchard
Depression and Abdominal Pain in IBS Patients: The Mediating Role of Catastrophizing
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2004; 66(3): 435 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Psychosomatic Society