| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine (D.S., D.S.S), University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (P.L.B., H.O.), and Department of Endodontics (W.M.), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Address reprint requests to: David Sheffield, PhD, Research Services - 151, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, 1601 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32608. Email: sheffdc{at}medicine.ufl.edu
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine race and sex differences in cutaneous pain perception.
METHODS: Pain perception was measured using a suprathreshold evaluation of pain intensity and pain unpleasantness to a series of thermal stimuli in 27 whites (14 men and 13 women) and 24 African Americans (12 men and 12 women). Blood pressure, depressive symptoms, anxiety state levels, and negative mood were assessed before pain testing to examine whether they might account for any sex or race differences in pain perception that emerged.
RESULTS: African Americans rated the stimuli as more unpleasant and showed a tendency to rate it as more intense than whites. Women showed a tendency to rate the stimuli as more unpleasant and more intense than men. In addition, systolic blood pressure was inversely related to pain intensity. After statistically adjusting for systolic blood pressure, sex differences in pain unpleasantness were reduced and sex differences in pain intensity were abolished; race differences were unaltered.
CONCLUSIONS: These differences in pain perception may be associated with different pain mechanisms: in the case of sex, differences in opioid activity and baroreceptor-regulated pain systems; in the case of race, unmeasured psychological characteristics are suggested by the larger differences in ratings of pain unpleasantness than pain intensity.
Key Words: pain intensity painunpleasantness blood pressure race sex
Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance; STAI = State-Trait AnxietyInventory; VAMS = Visual Analogue Mood Scale; VAS = VisualAnalogue Scale.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Hernandez and N. Sachs-Ericsson Ethnic Differences in Pain Reports and the Moderating Role of Depression in a Community Sample of Hispanic and Caucasian Participants With Serious Health Problems Psychosom Med, January 1, 2006; 68(1): 121 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Mechlin, W. Maixner, K. C. Light, J. M. Fisher, and S. S. Girdler African Americans Show Alterations in Endogenous Pain Regulatory Mechanisms and Reduced Pain Tolerance to Experimental Pain Procedures Psychosom Med, November 1, 2005; 67(6): 948 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Sheps, F. Creed, and R. E. Clouse Chest Pain in Patients With Cardiac and Noncardiac Disease Psychosom Med, November 1, 2004; 66(6): 861 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Whelan, L. Jin, and D. Meltzer Pain and Satisfaction With Pain Control in Hospitalized Medical Patients: No Such Thing as Low Risk Arch Intern Med, January 26, 2004; 164(2): 175 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Callister Cultural Influences on Pain Perceptions and Behaviors Home Health Care Management Practice, April 1, 2003; 15(3): 207 - 211. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Barakat, Z Wells, S Ramdhany, P G Mills, and A D Timmis Bangladeshi patients present with non-classic features of acute myocardial infarction and are treated less aggressively in east London, UK Heart, March 1, 2003; 89(3): 276 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Myers, M. E. Robinson, J. L. Riley III, and D. Sheffield Sex, Gender, and Blood Pressure: Contributions to Experimental Pain Report Psychosom Med, July 1, 2001; 63(4): 545 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Edwards, D. M. Doleys, R. B. Fillingim, and D. Lowery Ethnic Differences in Pain Tolerance: Clinical Implications in a Chronic Pain Population Psychosom Med, March 1, 2001; 63(2): 316 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |