Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gregerson, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gregerson, M. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pulmonary
Right arrow Reviews
Psychosomatic Medicine 62:816-827 (2000)
© 2000 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The Curious 2000-Year Case of Asthma

M. Banks Gregerson, PhD

From The Family Therapy Institute of Alexandria, Alexandria, Virginia.

Address reprint requests to: Dr. M. Banks Gregerson, The Family Therapy Institute of Alexandria, 220 S. Washington St., Alexandria, VA 22314-2215. Email: oltowne{at}aol.com

Millions worldwide have asthma, with the numbers succumbing increasing sharply in the past two decades. After 2000 years of scientific study, who succumbs to asthma when is as puzzling as who regains health when and how. The discipline of psychosomatic medicine and science investigates and treats diseases like asthma that typically confound general medicine. Still psychosomatic medicine, like general medicine, only manages but does not remedy asthma, which can currently only be in remission but not cured. This historical review reveals the progress and missteps that have been made in the study and treatment of asthma by comparing the general medicine approach with the major research findings on asthma published over 60 years in Psychosomatic Medicine. Research has identified antecedent, collateral, and subsequent factors to scientifically describe and control this disease in terms of diagnosis, management, and treatment. Paradoxically and regrettably, the prognosis for those with asthma is worse than ever. Curious also that a noninfectious disease should spread so rapidly and mostly for specific groups identified by variables like age, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Furthermore, partial, not full, family concordance indicates merely genetic influence, not determination. General medicine now focuses on enumerating the range of environmental and situational triggers, or stimuli, producing asthma and describing the pathophysiology of bronchial inflammation. With a more comprehensive multifactorial approach, psychosomatic medicine seems well suited to investigate further the physiological, psychological, social, and environmental factors implicated in this medical conundrum. A future challenge for psychosomatic medicine is to stem the tide of rising prevalence and cure the disease of asthma.

Key Words: asthma • psychosomatic medicine • review of literature, • multifactorial model, • theory • method.

Abbreviations: APS = American Psychosomatic Society; SES = socioeconomic status.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Psychosomatic Society