Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blumenthal, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Swerdlow, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blumenthal, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Swerdlow, C. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Other Cardiovascular Medicine
Psychosomatic Medicine 63:275-281 (2001)
© 2001 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Prepulses Reduce the Pain of Cutaneous Electrical Shocks

Terry D. Blumenthal, PhD, Traverse T. Burnett and Charles D. Swerdlow, MD

From the Department of Psychology (T.D.B., T.T.B.), Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and Cedars Sinai Medical Center (C.D.S.), Los Angeles, California.

Address reprint requests to: Terry D. Blumenthal, PhD, Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109. Email: blumen{at}wfu.edu

OBJECTIVE: Both the startle reflex elicited by an intense acoustic or tactile stimulus and the perceived intensity of that stimulus can be diminished by a weak "prepulse" that precedes the startling stimulus. The present study examined whether prepulses can also diminish the pain produced by an intense electrical stimulus similar to that used to treat life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias in conscious patients with implantable cardioverter/defibrillators or transcutaneous pacemakers.

METHODS: Perceptual and pain thresholds for electrical shocks to the arm were determined in 20 adults. Participants then rated the painfulness of 25 electrical shocks that were 1.5 times the pain threshold (mean shock intensity, {approx}160 V) and either presented alone or preceded (at 40–60 ms) by weak electrical prepulses equal to or 25% above the perceptual threshold.

RESULTS: Prepulses significantly reduced the pain produced by the intense shocks. Individuals with the lowest pain thresholds experienced the greatest pain reduction with prepulses. In these more sensitive individuals, the most effective prepulses reduced perceived pain by 26% across the entire test session and by 54% in the initial block of five shocks.

CONCLUSIONS: Prepulses may be useful in diminishing the pain associated with the therapeutic electrical shocks used to treat cardiac arrhythmias.

Key Words: implantable cardioverter/defibrillator • prepulse inhibition • pain • startle.

Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance; ICD = implantable cardioverter/defibrillator; T = perception threshold; VAS = visual analog scale.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
H. Kumru, E. Opisso, J. Valls-Sole, and M. Kofler
The effect of a prepulse stimulus on the EMG rebound following the cutaneous silent period
J. Physiol., February 1, 2009; 587(3): 587 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Psychosomatic Society