| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Department of Psychology (B.B.G.), State University of New York at Oswego, Oswego, New York; and the Department of Psychology (D.E.P, T.W.K, S.M.S), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Address reprint requests to: Brooks B. Gump, PhD, Department of Psychology, SUNY Oswego, Oswego, NY 13126. Email: gump{at}oswego.edu
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the effects of partner interactions on ambulatory blood pressure in a sample of 120 healthy adults who were monitored over a 6-day period.
METHODS: After each blood pressure measurement, participants rated characteristics of ongoing social interactions, along with emotional activation, physical activity, talking, posture, and other covariates, with computer-assisted self-report assessments.
RESULTS: Using multilevel modeling, we showed that blood pressure was significantly lower during social interactions with ones partner relative to social interactions with any other person and relative to periods of not interacting. Interactions with partners also were characterized by significantly less talking and emotional activation and more intimacy and perceived emotional support; however, these differences did not mediate the partner effect on blood pressure. In addition, the relative benefits of interacting with a partner were not moderated by relationship quality, gender, or race.
CONCLUSIONS: The effects of social situations on ambulatory blood pressure may represent one pathway through which social relationships affect cardiovascular health.
Key Words: blood pressure social interaction partner interactions cardiovascular health.
Abbreviations: DABS = Diary of Ambulatory Behavorial States; DAS = Dyadic Adjustment Scale; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; SBP = systolic blood pressure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. A. Sbarra and C. Hazan Coregulation, Dysregulation, Self-Regulation: An Integrative Analysis and Empirical Agenda for Understanding Adult Attachment, Separation, Loss, and Recovery Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2008; 12(2): 141 - 167. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Janicki, T. W. Kamarck, S. Shiffman, K. Sutton-Tyrrell, and C. J. Gwaltney Frequency of Spousal Interaction and 3-Year Progression of Carotid Artery Intima Medial Thickness: The Pittsburgh Healthy Heart Project Psychosom Med, November 1, 2005; 67(6): 889 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Grewen, S. S. Girdler, J. Amico, and K. C. Light Effects of Partner Support on Resting Oxytocin, Cortisol, Norepinephrine, and Blood Pressure Before and After Warm Partner Contact Psychosom Med, July 1, 2005; 67(4): 531 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jones Putting the Person into Person-Centered and Immediate Emotional Support: Emotional Change and Perceived Helper Competence as Outcomes of Comforting in Helping Situations Communication Research, June 1, 2004; 31(3): 338 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |