Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonk, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonk, V. A.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, B. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Psychosomatic Medicine 63:447-452 (2001)
© 2001 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Distraction Reduces Self-Reported Physiological Reactions to Blood Donation in Novice Donors With a Blunting Coping Style

Valerie A. Bonk, PhD, Christopher R. France, PhD and Brandie K. Taylor, BA

From the Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.

Address reprint requests to: Christopher France, PhD, Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA 45701-2979. Email: france{at}ohio.edu

OBJECTIVE: Vasovagal reactions experienced by some blood donors (eg, faintness, lightheadedness, and dizziness) have been shown to be related to a decreased likelihood of future blood donations. This study evaluated the efficacy of audiovisual distraction as a means of reducing self-reported physiological reactions in first-time blood donors. Because interventions that are consistent with an individual’s preferred coping style have been shown to be more effective at reducing physiological and psychological responses to stressful medical procedures, coping style (monitoring vs. blunting) was assessed as a possible moderating variable.

METHODS: First-time blood donors were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: audiovisual distraction or no-treatment control. Participants in the distraction group donated blood at an American Red Cross blood drive while watching a three-dimensional video presentation on a personal visor and headset. The control group donated blood according to standard American Red Cross procedures. Score on a self-reported measure of physiological reactions completed immediately after donation served as the dependent variable.

RESULTS: Individuals who typically use blunting coping strategies to cope with stress reported an attenuation of vasovagal reactions to blood donation in the distraction vs. the control condition (t(49) = 2.29, p < .05), whereas donors who prefer a monitoring coping style did not benefit from distraction.

CONCLUSIONS: Among first-time blood donors, audiovisual distraction may be an effective means of reducing vasovagal reactions in donors who prefer to cope with stress using such strategies as distraction, denial, and reinterpretation.

Key Words: audiovisual distraction • vasovagal reactions • blood donation.

Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance; BDRI = Blood Donation Reactions Inventory.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. F. Eder, C. D. Hillyer, B. A. Dy, E. P. Notari IV, and R. J. Benjamin
Adverse Reactions to Allogeneic Whole Blood Donation by 16- and 17-Year-Olds
JAMA, May 21, 2008; 299(19): 2279 - 2286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Psychosomatic Society