Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohr, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohr, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neurology
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Psychosomatic Medicine 64:803-809 (2002)
© 2002 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Moderating Effects of Coping on the Relationship Between Stress and the Development of New Brain Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis

David C. Mohr, PhD, Donald E. Goodkin, MD, Sarah Nelson, DrRerNat, Darcy Cox, PsyD and Michael Weiner, MD

From the University of California, San Francisco, CA.

Address reprint requests to: David C. Mohr, University of California at San Francisco, VAMC, 4150 Clement Street (116-A), San Francisco, CA 94121. Email: dmohr{at}itsa.ucsf.edu

OBJECTIVE: Many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) report that stress can trigger disease exacerbations. Considerable research has supported a relationship between stress and both clinical exacerbation and the development of new brain lesions. However, these relationships are not always consistent either within patients or across patients, suggesting the presence of moderators. This study examined the hypothesis that coping moderates the subsequent relationship between stress and the development of new brain lesions in MS.

METHODS: Thirty-six patients (mean age = 44.4; 22 women, 14 men) with relapsing forms of MS were assessed once every 4 weeks for 28–100 weeks. New brain lesions were identified using monthly Gd+ MRI. Stress was measured within 24 hours before MRI using a modified version of the Social Readjustment Rating Scale that assessed Conflict and Disruption in Routine. Coping was measured at baseline using the Coping with Health Injuries and Problems questionnaire, which produces four scales: distraction, instrumental, palliative, and emotional preoccupation. Data were analyzed using mixed effects logistic regression to account for within-subject correlations. Analyses were lagged such that stress assessments predicted new Gd+ MRI brain lesions 8 weeks later.

RESULTS: As reported previously, stress was significantly related to the development of new Gd+ brain lesions 8 weeks later (OR = 1.62, p = .009). Greater use of distraction was found to be a significant moderator of the relationship between stress and new Gd+ lesions (OR = 0.69, p = .037) such that greater use of distraction was associated with a decreased relationship between stress and new Gd+ lesions. Increased instrumental coping was marginally associated with a decreased relationship between stress and new Gd+ lesions (OR = 0.77, p = .081), while increased emotional preoccupation was marginally associated with an increased relationship between stress and new Gd+ lesions (OR = 1.46, p = .088). There was no significant moderating effect for palliative coping (p = .27) and no significant main effects for any coping variables and the subsequent development of new Gd+ brain lesions (p values > .21).

CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide modest support for the hypothesis that coping can moderate the relationship between stress and the MS disease activity. Several limitations in this study are discussed. While these findings suggest areas of potentially fruitful research, readers are cautioned that these are preliminary results; inferences regarding the clinical importance of these findings are premature.

Key Words: stress, • multiple sclerosis, • coping, • mind-body.

Abbreviations: CHIP = Coping with Health Injuries and Problems;; CNS = central nervous system;; EAE = experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis;; EDSS = Expanded Disability Scale Score;; Gd+ = gadolinium enhancing;; IFNß-1b = interferon beta-1b;; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging;; MS = multiple sclerosis;; OR = odds ratio;; RRMS = relapsing-remitting MS;; SPMS = secondary-progressive MS;; SRRS = Social Readjustment Rating Scale.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
A Bitton, P L Dobkin, M D Edwardes, M J Sewitch, J B Meddings, S Rawal, A Cohen, S Vermeire, L Dufresne, D Franchimont, et al.
Predicting relapse in Crohn's disease: a biopsychosocial model
Gut, October 1, 2008; 57(10): 1386 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Holist NursHome page
L. J. Phillips and A. K. Stuifbergen
The Influence of Positive Experiences on Depression and Quality of Life in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis
J Holist Nurs, March 1, 2008; 26(1): 41 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
S. Kern and T. Ziemssen
Review: Brain immune communication psychoneuroimmunology of multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 6 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
R F Brown, C C Tennant, M Sharrock, S Hodgkinson, S M Dunn, and J D Pollard
Relationship between stress and relapse in multiple sclerosis: part II. Direct and indirect relationships
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2006; 12(4): 465 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
R F Brown, C C Tennant, S M Dunn, and J D Pollard
A review of stress-relapse interactions in multiple sclerosis: important features and stress-mediating and -moderating variables
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2005; 11(4): 477 - 484.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
R. D Simmons, A.-L. Ponsonby, I. A. van der Mei, and P. Sheridan
What affects your MS? Responses to an anonymous, Internet-based epidemiological survey
Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 2004; 10(2): 202 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Psychosomatic Society