Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emery, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stern, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Emery, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stern, S. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Social Support
Right arrow Quality of Life
Right arrow Sexual Medicine: Male
Right arrow General Sexual Medicine Issues
Right arrow Other Cardiovascular Medicine
Psychosomatic Medicine 66:190-197 (2004)
© 2004 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Gender Differences in Quality of Life Among Cardiac Patients

Charles F. Emery, PhD, David J. Frid, MD, Tilmer O. Engebretson, PhD, Angelo A. Alonzo, PhD, Anne Fish, PhD, Amy K. Ferketich, PhD, Nancy R. Reynolds, PhD, Jean-Pierre L. Dujardin, PhD, JoAnn E. Homan, MSN and Stephen L. Stern, MD

From Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Charles F. Emery, Ph.D., 213 Townshend Hall, 1885 Neil Avenue, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210. E-mail: emery.33{at}osu.edu

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies of quality of life among cardiac patients have examined mostly men. This study evaluated gender differences in quality of life and examined the degree to which social support was associated with quality of life.

METHODS: A sample of 536 patients (35% women) was recruited during a 14-month period from the inpatient cardiology service of a University-based hospital. Participants completed assessments at baseline and at 3-month intervals over the subsequent 12 months, for a total of 5 assessments. Measures at each assessment included quality of life [Mental Component Score (MCS) and Physical Component Score (PCS) from the Medical Outcomes Study—Short Form 36] and social support [Interpersonal Support Evaluation List—Short Form].

RESULTS: A total of 410 patients completed the baseline assessment and at least one follow-up, and were included in the data analyses. Linear mixed effects modeling of the MCS score revealed a significant effect of gender (p = .028) and time (p < .001), as well as a significant interaction of gender by social support (p = .009). Modeling of the PCS revealed a significant effect of gender (p = .010) and time (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: Women with cardiac disease indicated significantly lower quality of life than men with cardiac disease over the course of a 12-month longitudinal follow-up. Social support, especially a sense of belonging or companionship, was significantly associated with emotional quality of life (MCS) among women. Strategies to increase social support may be important for health and well-being of women with cardiac disease.

Key Words: quality of life, • cardiovascular disease, • gender differences, • social support.

Abbreviations: MI = myocardial infarction;; CHD = coronary heart disease;; PsyFAHD = psychosocial functioning and heart disease;; SF-36 = Medical Outcomes Study—Short Form 36;; PCS = physical component score;; MCS = mental component score;; ISEL-SF = Interpersonal Support Evaluation List—Short Form;; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory;; LOT = Life Orientation Test;; PSS = Perceived Stress Scale.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. J. Shaw, C. N. Bairey Merz, C. J. Pepine, S. E. Reis, V. Bittner, S. F. Kelsey, M. Olson, B. D. Johnson, S. Mankad, B. L. Sharaf, et al.
Insights From the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part I: Gender Differences in Traditional and Novel Risk Factors, Symptom Evaluation, and Gender-Optimized Diagnostic Strategies
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3_Suppl_S): S4 - S20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
J. Denollet
DS14: Standard Assessment of Negative Affectivity, Social Inhibition, and Type D Personality
Psychosom Med, January 1, 2005; 67(1): 89 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Psychosomatic Society