Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Treanor, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Treanor, J. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Immunology
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Psychosomatic Medicine 66:215-223 (2004)
© 2004 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Psychological Stress and Antibody Response to Influenza Vaccination: When Is the Critical Period for Stress, and How Does It Get Inside the Body?

Gregory E. Miller, PhD, Sheldon Cohen, PhD, Sarah Pressman, MS, Anita Barkin, MSN, CRNP, Bruce S. Rabin, MD, PhD and John J. Treanor, MD

From the Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (G.E.M.); the Department of Psychology (S.C., S.P.) and Student Health Services (A.B.), Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA; the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA (B.S.R.); and the Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (J.J.T.).

Address reprint requests to Gregory Miller, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver B.C., Canada V6T 1Z4. E-mail: gemiller{at}psych.ubc.ca

OBJECTIVES: This study attempted to determine whether stress of moderate intensity could modulate the antibody response to an influenza vaccination in healthy young adults, identify critical periods during which stress could influence antibody response, and delineate behavioral and biological pathways that might explain relations between stress and antibody.

METHODS: A cohort of 83 healthy young adults underwent 13 days of ambulatory monitoring before, during, and after vaccination. Four times daily, subjects reported the extent to which they felt stressed and overwhelmed and collected a saliva sample that was later used to measure cortisol. A battery of health practices (cigarette smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, sleep hygiene) was assessed daily. Antibody titers to the vaccine components were measured at baseline and at 1-month and 4-month follow-up assessments.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: To the extent that they reported higher levels of stress across the monitoring period, subjects exhibited poorer antibody responses to the New Caledonia strain of the vaccine. Stress ratings on the 2 days before the vaccine and the day it was given were not associated with antibody response. However, the 10 days afterward appeared to be a window of opportunity during which stress could shape the long-term antibody response to varying degrees. With respect to potential mediating pathways, little evidence emerged in favor of cortisol secretion, alcohol consumption, physical activity, or cigarette smoking. However, analyses were consistent with a pattern in which feelings of stress and loss of sleep become locked into a feed-forward circuit that ultimately diminishes the humoral immune response. These findings may shed light on the mechanisms through which stress increase vulnerability to infectious disease.

Key Words: stress, • daily diary, • vaccine, • influenza, • sleep, • cortisol, • psychoneuroimmunology.

Abbreviations: AUC = area under the curve.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
C. Wrosch, G. E. Miller, and R. Schulz
Cortisol Secretion and Functional Disabilities in Old Age: Importance of Using Adaptive Control Strategies
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2009; 71(9): 996 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
S. Gallagher, A. C. Phillips, M. T. Drayson, and D. Carroll
Caregiving for Children With Developmental Disabilities Is Associated With a Poor Antibody Response to Influenza Vaccination
Psychosom Med, April 1, 2009; 71(3): 341 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. E. Freedland, E. J.C. de Geus, R. N. Golden, W. J. Kop, G. E. Miller, V. Vaccarino, B. Brumback, M. M. Llabre, V. J. White, and D. S. Sheps
What's in a Name? Psychosomatic Medicine and Biobehavioral Medicine
Psychosom Med, January 1, 2009; 71(1): 1 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
S. W. Cole
Psychosocial Influences on HIV-1 Disease Progression: Neural, Endocrine, and Virologic Mechanisms
Psychosom Med, June 1, 2008; 70(5): 562 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
M. Hamer, D. Wolvers, and R. Albers
Using Stress Models to Evaluate Immuno-Modulating Effects of Nutritional Intervention in Healthy Individuals
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., December 1, 2004; 23(6): 637 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Psychosomatic Society