This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gedney, J. J. Articles by Fillingim, R. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gedney, J. J. Articles by Fillingim, R. B.

Sensory and Affective Pain Discrimination After Inhalation of Essential Oils

From the Division of Public Health Services and Research, University of Florida College of Dentistry, Gainesville, FL.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Roger Fillingim, 1600 SW Archer Road, Box 100404, Gainesville, FL 32610. E-mail: rfillingim{at}dental.ufl.edu

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effects of olfactory absorption of two commonly used therapeutic essential oils on sensory and affective responses to experimentally induced pain.

METHODS: A sex-balanced (13 men and 13 women) randomized crossover design was used to obtain pre- and posttreatment change scores for quantitative sensory ratings of contact heat, pressure, and ischemic pain across separate inhalation treatment conditions using essential oil of lavender, essential oil of rosemary, and distilled water (control). Subjective reports of treatment-related changes in pain intensity and pain unpleasantness were obtained for each condition using a visual analog scale. We interpret our findings with respect to the separate dimensions of sensory and affective processing of pain.

RESULTS: Analyses revealed the absence of changes in quantitative pain sensitivity ratings between conditions. However, retrospectively, subjects’ global impression of treatment outcome indicated that both pain intensity and pain unpleasantness were reduced after treatment with lavender and marginally reduced after treatment with rosemary, compared with the control condition.

CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that aromatherapy may not elicit a direct analgesic effect but instead may alter affective appraisal of the experience and consequent retrospective evaluation of treatment-related pain.

Key Words: aromatherapy, • sensory testing, • pain intensity, • pain unpleasantness.

Abbreviations: PANAS = Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale;; RIA = radioimmunoassay;; STAI = State Trait Anxiety Index;; VAS = visual analog scales.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. R. Cassileth, G. E. Deng, J. E. Gomez, P. A. S. Johnstone, N. Kumar, and A. J. Vickers Complementary Therapies and Integrative Oncology in Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 340S - 354S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. N. Martin The Effect of Exposure to Odor on the Perception of Pain Psychosom Med, July 1, 2006; 68(4): 613 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Kuriyama, S. Watanabe, T. Nakaya, I. Shigemori, M. Kita, N. Yoshida, D. Masaki, T. Tadai, K. Ozasa, K. Fukui, et al. Immunological and Psychological Benefits of Aromatherapy Massage Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., June 1, 2005; 2(2): 179 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]