Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zautra, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zautra, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Musculoskeletal
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Psychosomatic Medicine 67:147-155 (2005)
© 2005 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Fibromyalgia: Evidence for Deficits in Positive Affect Regulation

Alex J. Zautra, PhD, Robert Fasman, MA, John W. Reich, PhD, Peter Harakas, MSc, Lisa M. Johnson, MA, Maureen E. Olmsted, PhD and Mary C. Davis, PhD

From the Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Alex J. Zautra, PhD, Department of Psychology, Box 871104, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104. E-mail: alex.zautra{at}asu.edu

Objective: Fibromyalgia (FMS) is characterized by chronic pain, high psychiatric comorbidity, and the absence of observable pathology. Our objective was to examine positive and negative affective indices, both at the trait and contextual levels, in FMS compared with a chronic pain control group, osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods: The sample consisted of 126 female FMS (87) and OA (39) patients from the community. Participants answered a self-report questionnaire assessing demographic and personality variables and were interviewed regarding average pain, affect, anxiety, and depression. Participants were then interviewed weekly for up to 12 weeks regarding pain, affect, fatigue, perceived interpersonal stress (IS), and positive interpersonal events (PE).

Results: FMS participants reported lower levels of positive affect (p < .01) and extraversion (p < .01) than OA participants. There were no significant differences between groups in negative affect, depression, anxiety, or neuroticism after controlling for age and average pain. At the weekly level, FMS participants reported lower levels of positive affect (p < .01), but not negative affect. Furthermore, during weeks of elevated IS, FMS participants evidenced steeper declines in positive affect than OA participants (p < .01).

Conclusions: Despite the predominance of literature focusing on psychologic disturbance in FMS, these analyses identified dysfunctional positive affect regulation as a key feature of FMS. FMS status was uniquely characterized by lower levels of positive affect, especially during stressful weeks. These findings challenge current conceptualizations of FMS and point to new directions for interventions that focus on improving positive affective resources, especially during times of stress.

Key Words: fibromyalgia • positive affect • interpersonal stress • osteoarthritis • chronic pain

Abbreviations: FMS = fibromyalgia syndrome; OA = osteoarthritis; PA = positive affect; NA = negative affect; IS = perceived interpersonal stress; PE = positive interpersonal events.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Psychosomatic Society