Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ullrich, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kreder, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ullrich, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kreder, K. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sympathetic Nervous System
Right arrow Personality
Right arrow Sexual Medicine: Male
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Psychosomatic Medicine 67:476-482 (2005)
© 2005 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Stress, Hostility, and Disease Parameters of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Philip M. Ullrich, PhD, Susan K. Lutgendorf, PhD, Jane Leserman, PhD, Derek G. Turesky, BA and Karl J. Kreder, MD

From the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA (P.M.U.); the Departments of Psychology and Obstetrics and Gynecology (S.K.L., D.G.T.) and Urology (K.J.K.), University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; and the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (J.L.).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Philip M. Ullrich, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, box 359740, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104. E-mail: pullrich{at}u.washington.edu

Objective: Psychological factors such as stress are known to influence activity in the sympathetic nervous system and hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, systems that in turn have been implicated in the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Associations between psychological stress and prostate function have not been directly examined. The objective of this study was to examine associations among stress, hostility, and BPH disease parameters.

Methods: Eighty-three men diagnosed with BPH completed self-report and interview measures of stress and hostility followed by measures of urologic function.

Results: Higher lifetime stress was associated with lower prostate volumes and residual urine volumes (p’s < .05). By contrast, high recent stress and hostility were associated with greater residual urine (p’s < .05). Stress and hostility were not associated with self-report ratings of urologic symptoms.

Conclusions: Stress and hostility were associated with objective measures of urologic functioning among men with BPH. Results highlight the need for increased attention in research and clinical settings toward associations between psychological factors and urologic disease.

Key Words: stress • hostility • benign prostatic hyperplasia • prostate

Abbreviations: BPH = benign prostatic hyperplasia; LUTS = lower urinary tract symptoms; SNS = sympathetic nervous system; AUA = American Urological Association; mL = milliliters; ANCOVA = analysis of covariance; HSD = honestly significant difference; SD = standard deviation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Psychosomatic Society