Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Subic-Wrana, C.
Right arrow Articles by Köhle, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Subic-Wrana, C.
Right arrow Articles by Köhle, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health Psychology
Right arrow Personality
Right arrow Anxiety
Right arrow Depression
Right arrow Somatoform
Psychosomatic Medicine 67:483-489 (2005)
© 2005 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Emotional Awareness Deficits in Inpatients of a Psychosomatic Ward: A Comparison of Two Different Measures of Alexithymia

Claudia Subic-Wrana, Dr. Rer. Medic., Susanne Bruder, Dr. Rer. Medic., Walther Thomas, Dr. Phil., Richard D. Lane, MD, PhD and Karl Köhle, Prof. Dr. Med.

From the Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne (C.S.W., S.B., W.T., K.K.); Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona, Tuscon, Arizona (R.D.L.).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Claudia Subic-Wrana, Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Josef-Stelzmann-Str. 9, D–50931 Köln, Germany. E-mail: claudia.subic-wrana{at}uk-koeln.de.

Objective: The TAS 20 has demonstrated strong psychometric properties in a broad variety of studies in healthy populations. Much less work has been done in clinical contexts exploring the validity of the TAS 20 as a measure of the cognitive processing of emotions. The TAS 20, a self-report scale, tends to correlate with self-reported negative affect, but in a clinical context it is important to be able to differentiate between negative affect and the cognitive processing of emotion. We therefore used the TAS 20 and a performance measure, the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS), which in previous studies demonstrated no overlap with measures of negative affect, to explore the ability of the two measures to detect deficits in emotional awareness in a clinical sample.

Methods: Data from inpatients of a psychosomatic ward were collected at onset (N = 394) and at the end of multimodal psychodynamic treatment (N = 249). The sample consisted of six diagnostic groups (depression; anxiety and compulsive–obsessive disorders, adjustment disorders, somatoform disorders, psychological factors related to somatic disorders, eating disorders). Changes in the TAS 20 and LEAS were compared at the two time points controlling for the effects of gender, age, educational level, and associations with self-reported negative affect.

Results: In contrast to the LEAS, the TAS 20 correlated with negative affect at the onset and the end of treatment. The scores of the TAS 20 decreased with treatment in all diagnostic groups but the change in the TAS 20 was not statistically significant when negative affect was controlled. In contrast, LEAS scores increased with treatment in the groups with somatoform disorders and psychological factors related to somatic disorders, and this change was independent of negative affect.

Conclusion: The LEAS captured a change in emotional awareness due to treatment, whereas the TAS 20 captured a change in negative affect. The LEAS appears to be a more specific measure of change in emotional awareness in clinical contexts than the TAS 20.

Key Words: alexithymia • emotional awareness • negative affect • LEAS • TAS 20 • psychosomatic patients

Abbreviations: TAS 20 = Toronto Alexithymia Scale; LEAS = Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale; STAI = State-Trait Anxiety Inventory; SCL 90 R = Symptom Check List, revised; abbreviations diagnostic groups: DEP = Depression; ANX = Anxiety and Compulsive–Obsessive Disorders; ADJ = Adjustment Disorders; SOM = Somatoform Disorders; PFS = Psychological Factors with Somatic Disorders; ED = Eating Disorders.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
L. E. Krahn, J. M. Bostwick, and C. M. Stonnington
Looking Toward DSM-V: Should Factitious Disorder Become a Subtype of Somatoform Disorder?
Psychosomatics, July 1, 2008; 49(4): 277 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social ScienceHome page
C. E. Lockenhoff, P. T. Costa Jr., and R. D. Lane
Age Differences in Descriptions of Emotional Experiences in Oneself and Others
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., March 1, 2008; 63(2): P92 - P99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
R. D. Lane
Neural Substrates of Implicit and Explicit Emotional Processes: A Unifying Framework for Psychosomatic Medicine
Psychosom Med, February 1, 2008; 70(2): 214 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
A. K. Mattila, O. Poutanen, A.-M. Koivisto, R. K.R. Salokangas, and M. Joukamaa
Alexithymia and Life Satisfaction in Primary Healthcare Patients
Psychosomatics, December 1, 2007; 48(6): 523 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Psychosomatic Society