Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vickers, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vickers, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Statistical Corner
Psychosomatic Medicine 67:652-655 (2005)
© 2005 American Psychosomatic Society


STATISTICAL CORNER

Analysis of Variance Is Easily Misapplied in the Analysis of Randomized Trials: A Critique and Discussion of Alternative Statistical Approaches

Andrew J. Vickers, PhD

From the Integrative Medicine Service, Biostatistics Service, MSKCC, New York, NY.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Andrew Vickers, PhD, Department of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10021. E-mail: vickersa{at}mskcc.org

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is a statistical method that is widely used in the psychosomatic literature to analyze the results of randomized trials, yet ANOVA does not provide an estimate for the difference between groups, the key variable of interest in a randomized trial. Although the use of ANOVA is frequently justified on the grounds that a trial incorporates more than two groups, the hypothesis tested by ANOVA for these trials—"Are all groups equivalent?"—is often scientifically uninteresting. Regression methods are not only applicable to trials with many groups, but can be designed to address specific questions arising from the study design. ANOVA is also frequently used for trials with repeated measures, but the consequent reporting of "group effects," "time effects," and "time-by-group interactions" is a distraction from statistics of clinical and scientific value. Given that ANOVA is easily misapplied in the analysis of randomized trials, alternative approaches such as regression methods should be considered in preference.

Key Words: randomized controlled trials • analysis of variance • statistical interpretation of data

Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance; ANCOVA = analysis of covariance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
A. Hartmann
PLEASE DON'T TALK BAD ABOUT GOOD OLD AUNT ANOVA!: A REPLY TO A.J. VICKERS' CRITIQUE
Psychosom Med, January 1, 2006; 68(1): 175 - 176.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Psychosomatic Society