Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rief, W.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rief, W.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Musculoskeletal
Right arrow Therapeutic Interventions
Psychosomatic Medicine 67:833-838 (2005)
© 2005 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Psychophysiologic Treatment of Chronic Tinnitus: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Winfried Rief, PhD, Cornelia Weise, DiplPsych, Nadine Kley, DiplPsych and Alexandra Martin, PhD

From the Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Marburg, Germany.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Winfried Rief, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Gutenbergstrasse 18, D- 35032 Marburg, Germany. E-mail: rief{at}staff.uni-marburg.de

Background: Tinnitus seems to be associated with psychophysiological over-activation (e.g., of head and shoulder muscles). Therefore we aimed to develop and evaluate a new intervention program including a psychophysiological approach.

Methods: Forty-three tinnitus sufferers were randomized to 2 groups, one receiving a psychophysiologically oriented intervention lasting 7 intervention sessions (plus 2 assessment sessions), whereas the other group waited for a comparable time period. Afterward, patients on the waiting list also received the intervention. Physiological variables were muscle activity of head and shoulders and electrodermal activity. Psychological assessments took place at pretreatment, post-treatment, and 6 months later. Follow-up data were available from 95% of participants. Major outcome variables were self-rating scales (e.g., tinnitus annoyance assessed by the Tinnitus Questionnaire), and diary data (self-control, daily time of perceiving the tinnitus).

Results: On most tinnitus specific variables, patients in the treatment group improved significantly more than patients on the waiting list. Main effect sizes for tinnitus-specific variables were up to 0.89. Muscle reactivity of head muscles at the beginning predicted significant treatment effects.

Conclusion: Compared with meta-analytical reviews of psychological interventions for tinnitus sufferers, the presented treatment is brief and in the upper range of effectiveness.

Key Words: tinnitus • physiological activity • biofeedback • self-control • cognitive-behavioral therapy • randomized clinical trial

Abbreviations: ES = effect size; GSI = General Symptomatic Index (mean score of Brief Symptom Inventory); IG = intervention group; MG = merged group; SCL-90R = symptom check list; TQ = Tinnitus Questionnaire; WLG = waiting list group.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Psychosomatic Society