Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Moor, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Moor, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anxiety
Right arrow Personality
Right arrow Quality of Life
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Right arrow Cancer
Psychosomatic Medicine 68:555-562 (2006)
© 2006 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Optimism, Distress, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Change in Cancer Antigen 125 Among Patients With Ovarian Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy

Janet S. de Moor, MPH, PhD, Carl A. de Moor, PhD, Karen Basen-Engquist, PhD, MPH, Andrzej Kudelka, MD, Michael W. Bevers, MD and Lorenzo Cohen, PhD

From the Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (J.S.d.M.); Children's Hospital Boston and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (C.A.d.M.); The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (K.B.-E., M.W.B., L.C.); and Regional Medical and Research Specialists, Pfizer Oncology, New York, New York (A.K.).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Janet S. de Moor, MPH, PhD, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Center for Community Based Research, 44 Binney Street, Smith 342, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: janet_demoor{at}dfci.harvard.edu

Objective: This study investigated whether situational and dispositional optimism were protective against dimensions of distress and aspects of health-related quality of life (HQoL) in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing chemotherapy. This study also evaluated whether optimism predicted a decrease in cancer antigen (CA) 125 levels during treatment.

Methods: Ninety women with epithelial ovarian cancer were assessed at the start and end of chemotherapy. Optimism, distress, and HQoL were measured by self-report; CA 125 levels were gathered from patients' medical charts.

Results: Both measures of optimism were inversely associated with baseline anxiety, perceived stress, and depression. In addition, situational optimism was positively associated with baseline social and physical well-being, and dispositional optimism was positively associated with baseline social and functional well-being. However, neither measure of optimism predicted domains of distress or HQoL at the follow-up assessment after controlling for baseline levels. Dispositional optimism predicted CA 125 at the end of treatment after controlling for baseline levels. However, neither situational nor dispositional optimism predicted CA 125 falling to normal levels (≤35 U/mL).

Conclusion: Consistent with prior research, optimism was inversely associated with distress and positively associated with HQoL in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Higher levels of dispositional optimism at the start of chemotherapy were associated with a greater decline in patients' CA 125 during treatment.

Key Words: optimism • anxiety • depression • perceived stress • health-related quality of life • CA 125

Abbreviations: CA = cancer antigen; HQoL = health-related quality of life; NK = natural killer; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor; PSS = Perceived Stress Scale; CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; FACT-O = Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian; LOT-R = Life Orientation Test-Revised; TSOS = Treatment-Specific Optimism Scale; SES = socioeconomic status; SWB = social well-being; PWB = physical well-being; FWB = functional well-being; {Delta} = change; SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error; Formula = sample mean.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
G. Alspach
Extending the Tradition of Giving Thanks Recognizing the Health Benefits of Gratitude
Crit. Care Nurse, December 1, 2009; 29(6): 12 - 18.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Psychosomatic Society