Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published online before print November 1, 2006, 10.1097/01.psy.0000244023.20755.cf
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christian, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stoney, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christian, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stoney, C. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Social Support
Right arrow Psychophysiology
Right arrow Other Cardiovascular Medicine
Psychosomatic Medicine 68:914-921 (2006)
© 2006 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Social Support Versus Social Evaluation: Unique Effects on Vascular and Myocardial Response Patterns

Lisa M. Christian, MA and Catherine M. Stoney, PhD

From Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (L.M.C.); and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (C.M.S.).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Catherine M. Stoney, PhD, National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail: stoneyc{at}mail.nih.gov

Objectives: This study examined the effects of companion presence and evaluation on cardiovascular reactivity to an acute stressor.

Methods: Eighty-two women completed a speech task in one of four conditions: with an evaluative companion present, with a nonevaluative companion present, alone while being evaluated by a companion with a video camera, or alone while the companion waited outside.

Results: A significant interaction between companion condition and evaluative condition on systolic blood pressure was found; women who were evaluated while alone demonstrated significantly greater reactivity than did women who were in the nonevaluative alone condition. Furthermore, both potential for evaluation and the presence of a companion had important influences on hemodynamic parameters underlying the blood pressure response. Specifically, those in evaluative conditions showed greater myocardial responding than those in nonevaluative conditions and those in alone conditions showed greater vascular responding than did those with companions present. Taken together, those in the evaluative alone condition demonstrated systolic blood pressure responses reflecting both myocardial and vascular contributions.

Conclusions: Social support and social evaluation have unique effects on vascular and myocardial responding. The implications for future research include focus on the stress-buffering model of social support and the value of including impedance cardiography measures in investigations of cardiovascular functioning.

Key Words: cardiovascular reactivity • social support • evaluation • vascular resistance • impedance cardiography

Abbreviations: CVD = cardiovascular disease; SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; MAP = mean arterial pressure; TPR = total peripheral resistance; TPRI = total peripheral resistance index; CO = cardiac output; CI = cardiac index; PEP = preejection period; SV = stroke volume; BMI = body mass index; BSA = body surface area.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. C. Ziegelstein
Acute Emotional Stress and Cardiac Arrhythmias
JAMA, July 18, 2007; 298(3): 324 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Psychosomatic Society