Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published online before print August 25, 2008, 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181835cb7
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burns, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Bruehl, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burns, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Bruehl, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Personality
Psychosomatic Medicine 70:898-905 (2008)
© 2008 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Trait Anger Management Style Moderates Effects of Actual ("State") Anger Regulation on Symptom-Specific Reactivity and Recovery Among Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

John W. Burns, PhD, Amanda Holly, PhD, Phillip Quartana, MS, Brandy Wolff, MS, Erika Gray, MS and Stephen Bruehl, PhD

From the Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois (J.W.B., A.H., P.Q., B.W., E.G.); and the Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee (S.B.).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to John W. Burns, PhD, Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Rd., North Chicago, IL 60064. E-mail: john.burns{at}rosalindfranklin.edu

Objectives: We examined whether "state" anger regulation—inhibition or expression—among chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients would affect lower paraspinal (LP) muscle tension following anger-induction, and whether these effects were moderated by trait anger management style.

Method: Eighty-four CLBP patients underwent harassment, then they regulated anger under one of two conditions: half expressed anger by telling stories about people depicted in pictures, whereas half inhibited anger by only describing objects appearing in the same pictures. They completed the anger-out and anger-in subscales (AOS; AIS) of the anger expression inventory.

Results: General Linear Model procedures were used to test anger regulation condition by AOS/AIS by period interactions for physiological indexes. Significant three-way interactions were found such that: a) high trait anger-out patients in the inhibition condition appeared to show the greatest LP reactivity during the inhibition period followed by the slowest recovery; b) high trait anger-out patients in the expression condition appeared to show the greatest systolic blood pressure (SBP) reactivity during the expression period followed by rapid recovery.

Conclusions: Results implicate LP muscle tension as a potential physiological mechanism that links the actual inhibition of anger following provocation to chronic pain severity among CLBP patients. Results also highlight the importance of mismatch situations for patients who typically regulate anger by expressing it. These CLBP patients may be at particular risk for elevated pain severity if circumstances at work or home regularly dictate that they should inhibit anger expression.

Key Words: anger regulation • trait anger-out • trait anger-in • symptom-specific reactivity • chronic pain

Abbreviations: CLBP = chronic low back pain; EMG = electromyography; AOS = anger-out scale; AIS = anger-in scale; LP = lower paraspinal muscles; SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; HR = heart rate; LIWC = linguistic inquiry and word count.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
J. W. Burns, P. J. Quartana, and S. Bruehl
Anger Management Style Moderates Effects of Attention Strategy During Acute Pain Induction on Physiological Responses to Subsequent Mental Stress and Recovery: A Comparison of Chronic Pain Patients and Healthy Nonpatients
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2009; 71(4): 454 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Psychosomatic Society