Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published online before print May 4, 2009, 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181a23eee
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sbarra, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sbarra, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Mason, A. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Social Support
Right arrow Psychophysiology
Right arrow Blood Pressure
Psychosomatic Medicine 71:532-540 (2009)
© 2009 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Marital Dissolution and Blood Pressure Reactivity: Evidence for the Specificity of Emotional Intrusion-Hyperarousal and Task-Rated Emotional Difficulty

David A. Sbarra, PhD, Rita W. Law, MPhil, Lauren A. Lee, MA and Ashley E. Mason, BA

From the Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to David A. Sbarra, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 East University Blvd., Room 313, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0068. E-mail: sbarra{at}email.arizona.edu

Objective: To assess blood pressure (BP) reactivity as recently separated adults completed a laboratory task asking to mentally reflect on their relationship experiences. Marital separations and the experience of divorce are associated with increased risk for early mortality and poor health outcomes. Few studies, however, have investigated the potential psychophysiological mechanisms that may account for these broad-based associations.

Method: Seventy recently separated or divorced community-dwelling adults (26 men) completed self-report measures of divorce-related psychological adjustment. During a laboratory visit, quasi-continuous BP was assessed across four task periods, including a divorce-specific mental activation task (DMAT). A task-rated emotional difficulty (TRED) index was computed based on participants’ immediate appraisals of the task demands.

Results: After accounting for relevant health-related covariates and depressed mood, participants who reported higher degrees of divorce-related emotional intrusion and physical hyperarousal demonstrated significantly elevated resting BP at entry into the study. When assessing change from a within-person control task to the DMAT, a three-way interaction indicated that men reporting high TRED scores evidenced significant increases in BP, whereas men reporting low TRED scores evidenced significant decreases in BP. Women evidenced no significant changes in BP across study periods.

Conclusions: Results suggest that divorce-related emotional intrusion-hyperarousal and real-time ratings of emotional difficulty (when people think about their separation experience) may play a specific role in BP reactivity, especially for men. These data shed new light on the potential mechanisms that may link marital dissolution and poor health.

Key Words: divorce • blood pressure reactivity • autonomic psychophysiology • social connectedness and health • emotion intrusion • multilevel modeling

Abbreviations: BP = blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; DMAT = divorce-related mental activation task; MER = mundane events recall task; SBP = systolic blood pressure; TRED = task-rated emotional difficulty.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
D. A. Sbarra
Marriage Protects Men from Clinically Meaningful Elevations in C-Reactive Protein: Results from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP)
Psychosom Med, October 1, 2009; 71(8): 828 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Psychosomatic Society