Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published online before print January 25, 2010, 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181cdc00e
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanton, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by James, S. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stanton, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by James, S. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Social Class
Right arrow Personality
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Right arrow Blood Pressure
Psychosomatic Medicine 72:141-147 (2010)
© 2010 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Socioeconomic Status Moderates the Association Between John Henryism and NEO PI-R Personality Domains

Michael V. Stanton, BA, Charles R. Jonassaint, PhD, Redford B. Williams, MD and Sherman A. James, PhD

From the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (M.V.S., C.R.J.) and Public Policy (S.A.J.), Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Departments of Psychiatry (R.B.W.) and Medicine (R.B.W.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Redford Williams, MD, Behavioral Medicine Research Center, Duke University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Box 2969, Durham, NC. E-mail: redfordw{at}duke.edu

Objective: To investigate associations between John Henryism (JH) and NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (PI-R) personality domains. JH—a strong behavioral predisposition to engage in high-effort coping with difficult psychosocial and economic stressors—has been associated with poor health, particularly among persons in lower socioeconomic (SES) groups. Unfavorable personality profiles have also been frequently linked to poor health; however, no studies have yet examined what global personality traits characterize JH.

Methods: Hypotheses were examined, using data from a sample of 233 community volunteers (mean age, 33 years; 61% black and 39% white) recruited specifically to represent the full range of the SES gradient. Personality (NEO PI-R) and active coping (12-item JH scale) measures and covariates were derived from baseline interviews.

Results: In a multiple regression analysis, independent of SES, JH was positively associated with Conscientiousness (C) (p < .001) and Extraversion (E) (p < .001), whereas the combination of low JH and high SES was associated with Neuroticism (N) (p = .02) When examining associations between JH and combinations of NEO PI-R domains called "styles," high JH was most strongly associated with a high E/high C "Go-Getters" style of activity, whereas low JH was associated with the low E/high Openness (O) "Introspectors" style. In facet level data, the most robust associations with JH were found for five C and five E facets.

Conclusions: High JH was associated with higher scores on C and E, but the combination of low JH and high SES was associated with higher scores on N.

Key Words: John Henryism • personality • coping • conscientiousness • extraversion • neuroticism

Abbreviations: SES = socioeconomic status; JH = John Henryism; N = Neuroticism; C = Conscientiousness; E = Extraversion; A = Agreeableness; O = Openness.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by the American Psychosomatic Society