Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by REDLICH, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by KIMBELL, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by REDLICH, F. C.
Right arrow Articles by KIMBELL, I., JR.

Psychosomatic Medicine 8:386-398 (1946)
© 1946 American Psychosomatic Society

Lumbar Puncture Reactions: Relative Importance of Physiological and Psychological Factors

FREDRICK C. REDLICH M.D.1, BURNESS E. MOORE M.D.1, and ISHAM KIMBELL JR. M.D.1

1 Department of Psychiatry and Mental Hygiene, Yale University School of Medicine

The relative significance of purely physiological and emotional factors in the pathogenesis of the post lumbar puncture syndrome was subjected to investigation.

One hundred hospitalized psychiatric patients were punctured routinely. From this random group were excluded all persons with gross deterioration, extreme psychotic states and contra-indications to spinal puncture. Alternate patients were punctured with number 16 and number 22 gauge needles. Preliminary observations, preparations and the procedure itself, as well as after-care, were carried out under standard conditions.

In the two groups punctured with different needles, patients were found to be well matched with respect to diagnoses, age, sex, and ratings as to intelligence, mood, emotional stability, chronic anxiety, and hypochondriacal trends.

The patients' knowledge of the procedure and its underlying principles was evaluated. This proved as low as their anticipatory anxiety was high. Before the puncture about half of the patients had heard of someone who had undergone the test and 23 per cent knew of ill effects in others.

Fifty-four per cent of the total showed some lumbar puncture symptoms; in the 16 needle group, 74 per cent reacted unfavorably as compared to 52 per cent in the 22 needle group. Five times as many severe reactions occurred with the large needle, and the duration of symptoms was markedly longer. These differences are statistically significant. Other symptoms, such as backache, nausea and vomiting, and stiff neck, are too rare to permit valid comparisons between the two groups, but they tended to occur with the severe reactions more characteristic of the group punctured with a 16 gauge needle.

The occurrence of symptoms had no significant relationship to the intelligence and emotional stability of the patients. Persons with normal mood seemed to suffer more severe headaches than those who were depressed or elated. The presence of chronic anxiety or hypochondriasis--mild or marked--evidently predisposed to a slight increase in incidence of complications, but there was no increase in the number of severe reactions.

Some increase in mild reaction was associated with anxiety with regard to the procedure. Unlike the intrinsic personality traits of the patients, which did not significantly affect reactions, knowledge of ill-effects in others does increase post lumbar puncture sequelae to a statistically significant degree. Hence, suggestion appears to be the primary psychological factor of importance in the production of symptoms. Knowledge of ill-effects in others does enhance anticipatory anxiety, and exerts a suggestive influence with consequent rise in number of sequelae.

The conclusion was reached that drainage is the most significant factor in the production of symptoms following lumbar puncture, outweighing by far the small contribution of anxiety, hypochondriasis and other emotional elements.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
F. J. Keefe, M. A. Lumley, A. L. H. Buffington, J. W. Carson, J. L. Studts, C. L. Edwards, D. J. Macklem, A. K. Aspnes, L. Fox, and D. Steffey
Changing Face of Pain: Evolution of Pain Research in Psychosomatic Medicine
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2002; 64(6): 921 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
F. W. REYNOLDS and J. E. MOORE
SYPHILIS: A Review of the Recent Literature
Arch Intern Med, November 1, 1947; 80(5): 655 - 690.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1946 by the American Psychosomatic Society