Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published online before print October 17, 2007
Psychosom Med 2007, doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e318157ad42
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gunthert, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kranzler, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gunthert, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kranzler, H. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Genetics
Right arrow Anxiety
Right arrow Stress and Coping
© 2007 by American Psychosomatic Society

Original Article


Received October 26, 2006
Returned for revision July 16, 2007

Serotonin Transporter Gene Polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and Anxiety Reactivity in Daily Life: A Daily Process Approach to Gene-Environment Interaction

Kathleen C. Gunthert , PhD, Tamlin S. Conner , PhD, Stephen Armeli , PhD, Howard Tennen , PhD, Jonathan Covault , MD, PhD, Henry R. Kranzler , MD


Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Howard Tennen, PhD, E-mail: tennen{at}nso1.uchc.edu.


   Abstract

Objective: To test whether individuals with at least one copy of the short (S) or long (L)G allele of the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) exhibit greater increases in anxiety, compared with LALA individuals, under periods of high daily stress. Although this common polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene has been identified as a vulnerability factor for anxiety, findings in the literature are mixed. Discrepant findings could be explained by recent research showing that 5-HTTLPR is functionally triallelic (LA versus LG or S), rather than biallelic (L versus S). Mixed findings could also result from a lack of attention to diathesis-stress models, whereby genetic vulnerability is considered latent until activated by stress (gene-environment interplay). Based on this model, we argue that genotype differences in anxiety should be stronger in the presence of stress. Methods: A total of 350 college students recorded their daily stressors and mood for two 30-day periods, separated by 1 year. Results: Across both years, diathesis-stress patterns were observed for reports of anxious mood as a function of 5-HTTLPR. Individuals with at least one copy of the S or LG allele at 5-HTTLPR experienced elevated anxious mood on days with more intense stressors, as compared with those who were LA homozygotes. Genotype differences in anxiety were less apparent on low stress days. No consistent allelic association of 5-HTTLPR was observed with any other mood states, trait anxiety, or neuroticism. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the potential value of focusing on genetic vulnerability in the context of everyday environmental triggers.

Key Words: serotonin transporter, anxiety, stress, reactivity, daily diary







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by the American Psychosomatic Society