Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published online before print May 4, 2009
Psychosom Med 2009, doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181a4fea8
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maloney, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maloney, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Reeves, W. C.
© 2009 by American Psychosomatic Society

Original Article


Received March 18, 2008
Returned for revision January 9, 2009

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and High Allostatic Load: Results From a Population-Based Case-Control Study in Georgia

Elizabeth M. Maloney , DrPH, MS, Roumiana Boneva , MD, PhD, Urs M. Nater , PhD, William C. Reeves , MD, MSc


Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Elizabeth M. Maloney, DrPH, MS, E-mail: evm3{at}cdc.gov.


   Abstract

Objective: To confirm the association of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) with high allostatic load (AL) level, examine the association of subsyndromal CFS with AL level, and investigate the effect of depression on these relationships and the association of AL with functional impairment, fatigue, symptom severity, fatigue duration, and type of CFS onset. AL represents the cumulative physiologic effect of demands to adapt to stress. Methods: Population-based case-control study of 83 persons with CFS, 202 persons with insufficient symptoms or fatigue for CFS (ISF), and 109 well controls living in Georgia. Unconditional logistic regression was used to generate odds ratios (ORs) as measures of the association of AL with CFS. Results: Relative to well controls, each 1-point increase in allostatic load index (ALI) was associated with a 26% increase in likelihood of having CFS (ORadjusted = 1.26, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.00, 1.59). This association remained in the presence and absence of depression (ORadjusted = 1.35, CI = 1.07, 1.72; ORadjusted = 1.35, CI = 1.10, 1.65). Compared with the ISF group, each 1-point increase in ALI was associated with a 10% increase in likelihood of having CFS (ORadjusted = 1.10, CI = 0.93, 1.31). Among persons with CFS, the duration of fatigue was inversely correlated with ALI (r = -.26, p = .047). Conclusions: Compared with well controls, persons with CFS were significantly more likely to have a high AL. AL increased in a gradient across well, ISF, and CFS groups.

Key Words: CFS, allostatic load, case-control, population-based, Georgia, SF-36







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Psychosomatic Society