Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

Published online before print October 29, 2009
Psychosom Med 2009, doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181c2d6b8
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lavoie, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, S. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lavoie, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bacon, S. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Depression
Right arrow Psychophysiology
Right arrow Other Cardiovascular Medicine
© 2009 by American Psychosomatic Society

Original Article


Received January 18, 2009
Returned for revision August 31, 2009

Association Between Clinical Depression and Endothelial Function Measured by Forearm Hyperemic Reactivity

Kim L. Lavoie , PhD, Roxanne Pelletier , PhD(c), André Arsenault , MD, Jocelyn Dupuis , MD, Simon L. Bacon , PhD


Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kim L. Lavoie, PhD, E-mail: k-lavoie{at}crhsc.rtss.qc.ca.


   Abstract

Objective: To assess associations between clinically significant depression (major depressive disorder [MDD] and minor depressive disorder [MiDD]) and endothelial function (EF), via forearm hyperemic reactivity (FHR), in patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging. Studies have linked MDD to impaired EF, an early marker of coronary heart disease (CHD) and risk factor for cardiac events, in healthy, noncardiac patients, although no studies have assessed the MDD-EF association in patients with or at risk for CHD. Methods: Depression was assessed, using the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders structured interview in 323 patients (n = 242 men; mean age = 59 years) with or at risk for CHD. FHR was assessed, using a dynamic nuclear imaging technique that measures the dilatory capability of the brachial artery during hyperemic challenge. The relative uptake ratio (RUR) of blood flow between hyperemic and nonhyperemic arms was used to measure FHR. Results: Patients with MDD and MiDD had lower RURs (mean values = 3.31 and 3.34, respectively), indicating poorer EF than patients without depression (mean = 4.27) (F = 5.19, p < .01), irrespective of CHD status. All results were adjusted for covariates including sociodemographic, medical, biochemical, and physiological variables. Conclusions: Patients with clinical levels of depression had worse FHR than patients without depression, irrespective of CHD status and after adjusting for covariates. Data extend previous findings, suggesting that the link between clinical depression and worse CHD outcomes may be mediated by EF.

Key Words: depression, forearm hyperemic reactivity, endothelial function, coronary heart disease







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Psychosomatic Society