Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by McGrath, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by McGrath, C. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Personality
Right arrow Psychophysiology

Hostile Attitudes Predict Elevated Vascular Resistance During Interpersonal Stress in Men and Women

Mary C. Davis, PhD, Karen A. Matthews, PhD and Claire E. McGrath, MA

From the Department of Psychology (M.C.D., C.M.), Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; and Department of Psychiatry (K.A.M.), University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.



View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Unadjusted change in DBP (mm Hg) ± SEM during task preparation and talk periods as a function of hostility group.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Unadjusted change in TPR (dynes-s · cm-5) ± SEM during task preparation and talk periods as a function of hostility group.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Unadjusted change in CO (liter/min) ± SEM during task preparation and talk periods as a function of hostility group.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Psychosomatic Society