Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kroenke, K.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kroenke, K.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, J. B. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Epidemiology
Right arrow Somatoform

The PHQ-15: Validity of a New Measure for Evaluating the Severity of Somatic Symptoms

Kurt Kroenke, MD, Robert L. Spitzer, MD and Janet B. W. Williams, DSW

From the Regenstrief Institute for Health Care and Department of Medicine (K.K.), Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN; and the New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry (R.L.S., J.B.W.), Columbia University, New York, NY.



View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Relationship between somatic symptom severity as measured by the PHQ-15 and decline in functional status as measured by the six subscales of the SF-20. The decrement in SF-20 scores are shown as the difference between each PHQ-15 severity group and the reference group (ie, those with PHQ-15 scores of 0–4). SF-20 scores are adjusted for age, sex, education, and number of physical disorders. Effect size is the difference in adjusted means divided by the pooled standard deviation for that scale.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Psychosomatic Society