Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Redwine, L.
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Redwine, L.
Right arrow Articles by Irwin, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Immunology
Right arrow Infectious Disease
Right arrow Sympathetic Nervous System
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Right arrow Other Cardiovascular Medicine

Acute Psychological Stress: Effects on Chemotaxis and Cellular Adhesion Molecule Expression

Laura Redwine, PhD, Shanna Snow, BS, Paul Mills, PhD and Michael Irwin, MD

From Department of Psychiatry (L.R., S.S., P.M.), University of California, San Diego; and Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunonology (M.I.), Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California.



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Chemotaxis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from African-American subjects reading magazines (o) or undergoing a speech task (127). Data are presented as cells migrating to FMLP-divided random migration of cells to media ± SEM. Blood was drawn at baseline (BL), immediately after the speech/reading task (0), and 20 minutes after the task (20). The two groups showed a differential change across the session with a significant group x time interaction (F[2,54] = 3.7, p = .03).

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Chemotaxis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from African-American subjects reading magazines (o) or undergoing a speech task (127). Data are presented as cells migrating to SDF-1 divided random migration of cells to media ± SE. Blood was drawn at BL, immediately after the speech/reading task (0), and 20 minutes after the task (20). The two groups showed a differential change across the session with a significant group x time interaction (F[2,54] = 3.2, p < .05).

 


View larger version (9K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Percentage of Mac-1 positive lymphocytes from African-American subjects reading magazines (o) or undergoing a speech task (127). Data are presented as mean ± SE. Blood was drawn at BL, immediately after the speech/reading task (0), and 20 minutes after the task (20). The two groups showed a differential change across the session with a significant group x time interaction (F(2,54) = 3.2, p < .05).

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Percentage of L-selectin positive lymphocytes from African-American subjects reading magazines (o) or undergoing a speech task (127). Data are presented as means ± SE. Blood was drawn at BL, immediately after the speech/reading task (0), and 20 minutes after the task (20). The two groups showed a differential change across the session with a significant group x time interaction (F(2,54) = 6.1, p = .004).

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Plasma levels of soluble L-selectin from African-American subjects reading magazines (o) or undergoing a speech task ({square}). Data are presented as mean (ng/ml) ± SE. Blood was drawn at BL, immediately after the speech/reading task (0), and 20 minutes after the task (20). The two groups showed a differential change across the session with a significant group x time interaction (F(2,54) = 3.1, p = .05).

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. A significant positive correlation between lymphocyte Mac-1 expression and E levels immediately after the task was revealed after covarying for basal Mac-1 and E levels (r = .43, p = .05).

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. A significant negative correlation between lymphocyte L-selectin expression and E levels immediately after the task was found after covarying for basal L-selectin and E levels (r = -0.46, p = .04).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Psychosomatic Society