Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bosch, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nieuw Amerongen, A. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bosch, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nieuw Amerongen, A. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dental
Right arrow Immunology
Right arrow Infectious Disease
Right arrow Stress and Coping

Stress as a Determinant of Saliva-Mediated Adherence and Coadherence of Oral and Nonoral Microorganisms

Jos A. Bosch, PhD, Marjolein Turkenburg, BS, Kamran Nazmi, BS, Enno C. I. Veerman, PhD, Eco J. C. de Geus, PhD and Arie V. Nieuw Amerongen, PhD

From Department of Dental Basic Sciences (J.A.B, M.T., K.N., E.C.I.V., A.V.N.A), Section Oral Biochemistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Oral Biology (J.A.B), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Faculty of Psychology, Department of Biological Psychology (E.J.C.D.G.), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.



View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The stepwise process of oral microbial colonization. 1) After secretion, a process almost exclusively governed by the autonomic nervous system, the salivary proteins form a pellicle on the host’s tissues. Typical constituents of this pellicle are the mucins (eg, MUC7) and various other secretory proteins such as lactoferrin, S-IgA, and {alpha}-amylase. 2) Whereas this pellicle may form a barrier against colonization by some microorganisms, other microorganisms have the capacity to use this pellicle as a means to adhere to the tissues of the host. Examples of the latter are viridans streptococci such as S. sanguis and S. gordonii. 3) Adherence leads to the formation of an adhesive microbial layer that subsequently may promote colonization of other microorganisms through coadherence (ie, adherence among microbial species). The secretory proteins also play an important role in this coadherence by inhibiting some microbe-microbe interactions although promoting others. Inhibition of coadherence is caused when secretory proteins block microbial receptors, hereby preventing binding to other microorganisms. Promotion of coadherence may occur when two microbial species carry receptors for the same salivary protein; hereby these microbial receptors become "cross-linked" by their common salivary ligand.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Saliva-mediated adherence of three species of oral streptococci during the control condition, memory test, and surgical video. Dots indicate means, vertical bars indicate SEM. For statistical analyses, the changes within each stressor condition were contrasted with the changes within the control condition (ie, time by condition interaction). Time x condition; *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Saliva-mediated adherence of H. pylori during the control condition, memory test, and surgical video. Dots indicate means, vertical bars indicate SEM. For statistical analyses, the changes within each stressor condition were contrasted with the changes within the control condition (ie, time by condition interaction). Time x condition; *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Coadherence of the yeast C. albicans to saliva-coated layers of S. gordonii during the control condition, memory test, and surgical video. Dots indicate means, vertical bars indicate SEM. For statistical analyses, the changes within each stressor condition were contrasted with the changes within the control condition (ie, time by condition interaction). Time x condition; *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Psychosomatic Society